170932 Making the Case for a Standardized Health Education Curriculum in Accredited Public Health Institutions

Monday, October 27, 2008

Kimberly Kisler, MPH, CHES , Community Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Erika Gist-Siever, MPH, CHES , Health Education Administration, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
Jacqueline Valenzuela, MPH, CHES , Health Education Administration, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
California Code stipulates that “A health educator hold a master's degree with specialization in public or community health education.” Master's degrees with a health education focus are not always referred to as such, complicating determining a candidate's eligibility to apply for Los Angeles County health education positions. In response, Health Education Administration (HEA), Los Angeles County's central health education unit, assessed the status of health education within California's eleven Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) accredited schools/programs. An instrument was developed to conduct a standardized review of each institution's health education track website. This review revealed: (1) All but one of the eleven institutions has a health education track; (2) The track titles are not consistently “public or community health education” and; (3) The core curricula for the health education tracks vary. The variation in track titles complicates ascertaining whether candidates' specialization complies with California Code. Furthermore, a track name does not guarantee candidates possess a basic health education skill set since a standardized health education curriculum is lacking. A quality assurance mechanism, such as a standard health education track curriculum based on The National Commission on Health Education Credentialing's “7 Areas of Responsibility,” would assure health educators enter the workforce with comparable skill sets while clarifying ambiguities within California Code. Implementing this recommendation would require identifying both a standardized curriculum and a process to assure its consistent use across all CEPH accredited schools.

Learning Objectives:
1. Identify the ambiguities present in the California Code of Regulations that complicate the inclusion of qualified health education candidates in applicant pools. 2. Describe the review process used to identify the status of health education within varying CEPH accredited institutions. 3. Associate how a standardized health education curriculum would facilitate the recruitment of qualified health education candidates. 4. Describe the implications of developing and implementing a standardized health education curriculum throughout CEPH accredited institutions.

Keywords: Accreditation, Health Education

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a Health Educator for the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and a PhD student at UCLA. I am qualified to be an author because of personal and professional experience with the subject matter.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.