173702 Teaching safety at summer camp: Evaluation of a water safety curriculum in an urban community setting

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Karla A. Lawson, PhD, MPH , Injury Prevention Program, Trauma Services, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, TX
Kelly M.K. Johnson, MS , Injury Prevention Program, Trauma Services, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, TX
Paula Yuma-Guerrero, MPH, CHES , Injury Prevention Program, Trauma Services, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, TX
Tareka C. Wheeler , Injury Prevention Program, Trauma Services, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, TX
R. Todd Maxson, MD, FACS , Injury Prevention Program, Trauma Service, Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, TX
Objectives: The purpose of this project was to test a water safety curriculum in a low-income, urban youth summer camp setting. The curriculum is available to Safe Kids Coalitions across the country; however it has not previously been evaluated for effectiveness.

Methods: Participants were Pre-K - 3rd grade students. Children watched a video and received the curriculum in a classroom setting. Each child was given a pre-, post-, and retention exam to assess knowledge change. Mean test scores and mean number of rules participants could list were analyzed using paired student t tests. Only data from children who took all three exams (n=92) was analyzed.

Results: The participants were 45.3% male, 22.2% Hispanic, 72.2% African American, and 5.6% biracial. Children were divided into three groups: Pre-K/kindergarten, 1st / 2nd grade, and 3rd grade. Children in each of the groups received higher knowledge scores at the post-exam (P=0.04, P<0.0001, P<0.0001, respectively), with little decline in scores at the three-week retention exam. Children in both the 1st /2nd grade and 3rd grade groups were able to list more rules at the post-exam (P<0.0001, P<0.0001) and at the retention exam (P= 0.004, P<0.0001) compared to baseline; the number of rules listed fell slightly between the post-exam and retention exam.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates that children possessed more knowledge of water safety after receiving this curriculum. Further evaluation of the curriculum's content and its impact on water safety beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors are needed, as well as evaluation of additional risk areas and various settings.

Learning Objectives:
1. Articulate the key components of the Danger Rangers Water Safety Curriculum and its potential utilization within the Safe Kids USA network. 2. Describe the change in water safety knowledge acquired by low-income youth receiving the Danger Rangers Water Safety Curriculum. 3. Explain the need for further evaluation of the curriculum’s impact on other outcome measures.

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the research coordinator on this research study. I lead the research team in study development, data collection, and analysis. I have a Masters in Health Sciences Research and have worked as an epidemiologist for 10 years.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.