176097
Achieving universal HIV screening: Following CDC recommendations in states with incompatible laws
Erika Aaron, CRNP
,
Division of ID/HIV Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Amy Hilley, MPH
,
Division of ID/HIV Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Brenda Martino
,
Division of ID/HIV Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Anita Vargas
,
Division of ID/HIV Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Joanna Bell, MD
,
Division of ID/HIV Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Issues: In September 2006, the CDC released guidelines recommending universal opt-out HIV screening, including elimination of written consent and pre-test counseling, throughout the health care system for every person aged 13-64. However, 22 states have legal statutes that restrict enactment of these recommendations. Pennsylvania, the seventh highest state in number of cumulative AIDS cases, requires written consent and pre-test counseling before HIV testing. Description: In Philadelphia, a university-based HIV clinic managing rapid HIV testing programs in a hospital-wide medical system attempted to incorporate the CDC's recommendations into their testing programs. Aims were to increase testing rates, recognize undiagnosed HIV infection, and decrease the stigma of testing. Program managers worked closely with the local health department, legal community, and legislators to ensure state regulations were followed while streamlining HIV testing and eliminating barriers to routine testing. Lessons Learned: Implementation plans were created that followed state laws, while allowing more streamlined and routinized HIV testing. Barriers to informed and voluntary HIV testing were reduced. Strategies included incorporating written HIV consent into universal medical consent for care, promotion of universal HIV testing throughout hospital system, and inclusion of educational materials to supplement pre-test counseling requirements. Recommendations: Work closely with city legislative and public health officials. Form alliances with HIV experts in the local legal community. Achieve buy-in from hospital administrators and staff. Educate staff about benefits of HIV detection and their key role in achieving patient acceptability of testing. Form linkages between HIV care practices and medical venues to achieve care linkage.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe at least one model for managing universal routine HIV testing programs in a state with legal restrictions on testing and counseling.
2. List two ways to reduce legal or administrative barriers to universal testing.
Keywords: HIV Interventions, Practice Guidelines
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have worked on the rapid HIV testing programs described in this abstract for 2 years. I have written protocols and policies regarding universal screening for our programs.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|