177326 Wisconsin Injury Prevention Coalition project: Reducing injuries through community-academic partnerships

Monday, October 27, 2008

Ann Christiansen, MPH , Injury Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Peter Layde, MD, MSc , Injury Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Barbara Hill, MSSW , Wisconsin Population Health Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Clare E. Guse, MS , Department of Family & Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Brianna C. Kopp, MPH , Injury Prevention Program, Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, Madison, WI
Background: The Wisconsin Injury Prevention Coalition project bridges geographic and institutional borders through community-academic partnerships. The project's aim is to reduce injuries by facilitating the translation of research into evidence-driven, community-based programs and policies.

Methods: The project conducted two assessments to identify opportunities for technical assistance and training, address early project barriers, and strengthen the overall partnership. At mid-point, academic partners administered a semi-structured interview to learn which program components were most and least valued and what changes could make the partnership work better. The other was a survey to assess the need for capacity building assistance in: problem identification; priority setting; program planning and implementation; and evaluation. Local health department staff assessed their knowledge and skills on a ten-point scale in each of these areas at mid-point and reflected back to their knowledge and skills at the beginning of the project.

Outcomes: Based on the semi-structured interviews, local health department staff perceived the most value from capacity development of skills essential in their positions, including finding and interpreting data, finding and understanding evidence-based research, developing a comprehensive program plan and designing and implementing relevant evaluation. A capacity assessment survey indicated that local health department staff had the greatest perceived change in their program planning and implementation skills, with an average increase of 3.37 (95% CI: 2.87 – 3.87) units.

Conclusion: Assessing opportunities for program improvement is beneficial to strengthening partnerships and determining need for technical assistance and training. Building on these opportunities can facilitate the translation of research into practice.

Learning Objectives:
Describe how a community-academic partnership can facilitate the translation of evidence-based research into public health practice; Describe the benefits of assessing a community-academic partnership for program improvement;

Keywords: Injury Prevention, Partnerships

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been one of the primary developers of this program.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.