177636 A Process Evaluation of a Mini-Grants Program to Disseminate Evidence-Based Nutrition Programs in Rural Churches and Worksites

Monday, October 27, 2008

Michelle Lisa Carvalho , Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Michelle Kegler, DrPH , Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Sally Honeycutt, MPH, CHES , Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Margaret Clawson, MPH , Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Darrell Sabbs , Community Benefits, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Albany, GA
Denise Ballard, MEd , Southwest Georgia Cancer Coalition, Albany, GA
Cecillia Morris , American Cancer Society, Albany, GA
Karen Glanz, PhD, MPH , Emory Prevention Research Center, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
In an effort to disseminate evidence-based interventions in rural communities, the Emory Prevention Research Center (EPRC) implemented a mini-grants program in collaboration with community partners in Southwest Georgia. The EPRC provided up to $4,000 and technical assistance to four African American churches and three worksites in rural Southwest Georgia to conduct research-tested interventions. A process evaluation was conducted to assess the how completely the sites implemented the interventions with fidelity and to generate lessons learned to inform future dissemination activities. The process evaluation also examined reach, recruitment, adaptation, context, resources and maintenance. Data collection tools included: activity forms, technical assistance logs, interviews with ten local coordinators, seven focus groups with committee members, and other program documents. Interviews and focus groups were tape-recorded, transcribed, coded and analyzed for themes. Preliminary findings indicate that technical assistance focused on core elements, linking to resources, and tailoring the program to their local context. Eleven months into the 12 month program, over 87% of the program core element activities had been completed across all mini-grant sites; and three of seven sites had completed all program core element activities. Influential contextual factors included past site coordinator experience in program planning, engagement of organizational leaders, and conflicting organizational or personal priorities for site coordinators. Implications of these findings for using mini-grants to disseminate evidence-based interventions in rural communities will be discussed.

Learning Objectives:
1. Discuss the use of mini-grants to disseminate evidence-based programs. 2. Describe the contextual factors that may influence program implementation.

Keywords: Nutrition, Evidence Based Practice

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have had an integral role in developing, planning and coordinating the community mini-grants program addressed in this abstract. I have collaborated with rural community partners in the regional setting of the mini-grant program during the past three years.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.