179704 An analysis of the failed attempt to expand the State Children's Health Insurance Plan: A view from Capitol Hill

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Barbara L. Kornblau, JD, OTR/L , Public Health Program, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Miami, FL
Nancy Hardt, MD , College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
After ten years of experience, state and national public health leaders, state and federal elected officials, and democrats and republicans alike agreed the State Children's Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP aka CHIP), successfully provided health insurance for uninsured children and pregnant women. During six years of its reign, the current administration approved waivers to individual states already covering SCHIP-eligible children through Medicaid. These waivers allowed states to cover children at higher income levels, some parents, and other uninsured individuals. The Senate and House worked independently on SCHIP reauthorization. The Senate negotiated a bipartisan bill for the reauthorization, paid for by tobacco taxes, which passed with a veto-proof majority. This bill would have expanded the number of children covered under both CHIP and Medicaid. The House version included similar expansions and changes to Medicare – all financed through changes in Medicare Advantage plus a smaller tobacco tax. Select members of the House and Senate negotiated a common bill. With overwhelming bipartisan support and the support of over 40 governors, many were perplexed when the President threatened to and subsequently did veto SCHIP reauthorization - not once but twice. In order to avoid state shortfalls and disenrollment of children, Congress was forced to include a smaller SCHIP package in a continuing resolution. Two Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy Fellows who worked on SCHIP, one in the House and one in the Senate, analyze the players, the politics, external influences, and the financing of SCHIP. They also look at possibilities for SCHIP's political future.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe 5 differences between the original House bill on the reauthorization of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and the original Senate’s version and compare those to the later “compromise” versions of the bills. 2. Compare and contrast the interests of 3 “players” in the CHIP debate and discuss their positions on CHIP. 3. Analyze the financing issues involved in CHIP, the number of children covered under different financing options, and the potential impact on public health.

Keywords: Access to Health Care, Financing

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I recently completed a Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy Fellowship in the US Senate and the House of Representatives working on health issues including the Children's Health Insurance Plan. I am Associate Dean for External Affairs of the University of Florida College of Medicine.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.