180545 Big Tobacco's “other” philanthropy: Think tanks, policy institutions and religious organizations

Tuesday, October 28, 2008: 5:30 PM

Laura Tesler, PhD , Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Whereas tobacco companies widely publicize their charitable donations to violence prevention, hunger programs and the like, they seldom discuss their contributions to think tanks, public policy institutions, and religious organizations, although many share the same tax-deductible, non-profit status. Drawing from internal industry documents archived online and triangulating them with other materials, this archival study explores how the relationships between Big Tobacco and these organizations have been formed and sustained, and analyzes their implications for public health policy and tobacco control efforts. First, we examine how tobacco companies have appropriated rhetoric from across the political spectrum in order to construct the impression of sharing “common ground” with these organizations, while obfuscating potential conflicts of interest. Next we show how companies have leveraged donations with recipients to promote pro-industry stances on legislation, through assistance with media coverage and recruitment of new allies within the non-profit sector. Through case studies, we demonstrate how these relationships adversely affect tobacco control and other public health issues in the arenas of both public opinion and public policy. We conclude with a consideration of how public health professionals can respond to these issues with competing cross-sector alliances for tobacco control.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe how the tobacco industry defines “philanthropy” in its public relations materials versus income tax-reporting. 2. Consider how the tobacco industry frames social issues and values. 3. Evaluate the impact of tobacco industry framing for public health.

Keywords: Tobacco Industry, Tobacco Policy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I performed the research and wrote the abstract.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.