180789
Employee perceptions of an environmental obesity prevention program
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Heather Bowen, MS, RD, LD
,
Department of Health Promotion and Behavior- College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Kristin M. Baker, MPH
,
Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
David M. DeJoy, PhD
,
Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Mark G. Wilson, HSD
,
Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Ron Z. Goetzel, PhD
,
Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Washington, DC
Ronald J. Ozminkowski, PhD
,
Consulting Economist, Ann Arbor, MI
Obesity is a major public health concern and worksites are ideal for reaching large numbers of adults with weight management messages and programs. In 2006, a large chemical company began implementing a combination of individual and environmental interventions to support the prevention and control of overweight and obesity among employees. In 2007, an employee satisfaction survey was administered to a random sample of employees (N = 2,280). The survey was a 12-item instrument intended to assess the exposure and satisfaction of the environmental interventions and contained questions related to the level of program awareness, participation, and helpfulness. Twenty-one percent of surveyed employees participated (N = 481). Employees reported the most participation in health risk assessments (70.0%) and healthy choice food options (56.9%). These two items also received the highest score for program helpfulness on a 5-point likert scale (1 = completely unhelpful to 5 = very helpful) with scores of 4.4 and 4.1, respectively. The most commonly reported reasons for participating in the programs included the desire to make a healthy change (52.4%), the recognition of the need to improve health behaviors (45.1%), and an interest in the intervention topic (35.1%). Barriers to employee participation included individual time commitments (22.9%), already being a healthy weight (14.2%), and the lack of motivation (11.0%). These practical findings can provide employers with a greater understanding of the factors that have both enhanced and hindered employee perception and participation in worksite health promotion interventions.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe the process of a worksite environmental obesity prevention program.
2. Examine the awareness, participation, and helpfulness of a worksite environmental obesity prevention program.
3. Discuss the practical implications of an environmental worksite obesity prevention program.
Keywords: Worksite, Obesity
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I assited in the data collection and analysis of this portion of the project.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|