181380 Individual and neighborhood disadvantage modifies the association between neighborhood walkability and BMI

Wednesday, October 29, 2008: 11:10 AM

Gina Lovasi, PhD , Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University, New York, NY
Kathryn M. Neckerman, PhD , Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University, New York, NY
James Quinn, MA , Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University, New York, NY
Christopher Weiss, PhD , Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University, New York, NY
Andrew Rundle, DrPH , Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
Introduction: Walkable environments have been associated with a lower BMI, but the strength of this association may depend on population characteristics. We identified four population characteristics to identify historically underserved individuals and neighborhoods (low educational attainment, low household income, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity) in order to test the hypothesis that disadvantaged populations would be more vulnerable to the constraints of their immediate environment, leading to stronger associations between built environment characteristics and BMI.

Methods: Height and weight were measured for a diverse sample of 13,102 adults living throughout New York City. Each participant's home address was geocoded and surrounded by a circular buffer with a one-kilometer radius. The composition and built environment characteristics of these areas, along with self-reported individual characteristics, were used to predict BMI using generalized estimating equations. Both individual-level and area-based measures of education, income, race, and ethnicity were used to generate stratified results and tests for interactions.

Results: Higher population density, more mixed land use, and more transit access were consistently associated with a lower BMI, but contrary to expectations this association was most consistent among those with more education or higher incomes, and among non-Hispanic whites. Significant interactions were observed for education, income, race and ethnicity.

Conclusions: We found that built environment characteristics were less consistently associated with BMI for disadvantaged groups. This pattern may be explained by disadvantaged groups encountering other barriers to maintaining a healthy weight, or self-selection being stronger among those with more control over selecting their area of residence.

Learning Objectives:
1. Understand the association between walkability and obesity for adults living in New York City 2. Recognize that built environment characteristics may not have the same health effects for advantaged and disadvantaged groups

Keywords: Obesity, Underserved Populations

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I played a leading role in designing and implementing the data analysis for this abstract and in interpreting the results.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.