Animal care professionals' perceived responsibilities in the evaluation and intervention of pet abuse and its connection to family violence

Studies suggest a connection between animal abuse and family violence. It is hoped that earlier intervention in animal abuse cases might prevent other forms of family violence. This pilot study investigates whether animal care professionals are aware of this link, how veterinarians identify and respond to signs of abuse, and their knowledge and utilization of local resources. Telephone interviews were conducted with two veterinarians, an animal control officer, and an animal shelter director. All participants recognized the link between pet abuse and family violence. The veterinarians knew little about animal abuse laws or local resources. Uncertainty about the intentionality of abuse and fear of losing customers seem to play a key role in responding to potential abuse cases. These findings suggest a number of areas needing further study. All respondents recognized the link between pet abuse and family violence, but the different perspectives (healthcare vs. public safety) differ in how they perceive their responsibilities. Veterinarians rarely screened for abuse and knew little about laws or resources. Interview responses suggest that current state laws are too vague to be useful when screening for abuse, educating the public and prosecuting offenders. Most laws categorize animals as property, with minimal punishment. This might decrease the likelihood of veterinarian involvement, particularly if it threatens their customer base. In general, there seems to be minimal communication between veterinarians and animal advocacy organizations, and none with Social Services. It is hoped that increased education, screening and collaboration could detect abuse earlier, with more effective intervention.