183351 Quality improvement and utilization management performance indicators: Does individualized feedback affect provider behavior?

Wednesday, October 29, 2008: 10:50 AM

Leslie A. Watts, MS , University of California, San Francisco, Bixby Center for Reproductive Health, Research & Policy, Sacramento, CA
Michael Policar, MD, MPH , University of California, San Francisco, Bixby Center for Reproductive Health, Research & Policy, Sacramento, CA
Heike Thiel de Bocanegra, PhD, MPH , University of California, San Francisco, Bixby Center for Reproductive Health, Research & Policy, Sacramento, CA
Michael Howell, MA , University of California, San Francisco, Bixby Center for Reproductive Health, Research & Policy, Sacramento, CA
John Mikanda, MD, MPH , California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA
Philip Darney, MD, MSc , University of California, San Francisco, Bixby Center for Reproductive Health, Research & Policy, Sacramento, CA
California's Department of Public Health, Office of Family Planning, which administers the State's publicly-funded family planning reproductive health program, Family PACT (Planning, Access, Care and Treatment), initiated in 2005 an innovative quality improvement activity using claims and client enrollment data. The sixth semi-annual individualized Family PACT Provider Profiles were sent to more than 2,000 providers in January 2008. We assessed whether regular feedback and peer-group comparison on performance indicators induces behavior change and thus, improves clinical outcome. The quality improvement and utilization management indicators and average peer-group performance indicators are clinically relevant, objectively measurable, and influenced by provider behavior. Providers that made a behavior change after receiving their first and/or second profiles will now see evidence of that change. Data trends show that private providers demonstrate the greatest change in aligning more closely with their peers in the following indicators: improving annual chlamydia screening rates in women under age 26 by 2% (from 68% in 2003 to 70% in 2007); reducing pregnancy testing per 100 encounters by 40% (from 52 to 21, respectively); and, reducing the percentage of E&M visits coded the highest level (99214) by 68% (from 25% to 13%, respectively). Histograms show that outliers move toward the peer median. Trends of public providers, historically aligning more closely with their peers, remain relatively stable. We will also discuss how these data guide technical assistance and provider support activities to improve quality of care and appropriate utilization of services.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe an innovative use of administrative and claims data for offering feedback to providers. 2. Identify family planning quality improvement and utilization management indicators used by a statewide program. 3. Describe the impact of provider feedback on performance measures.

Keywords: Quality Improvement, Indicators

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Through a collaboration of California's State Office of Family Planning and UCSF staff, I have participated in the development, implementation and continuing support of the provider profiles project beginning in 2003 to the present.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.