183507
Two Year Evaluation of a Public-Private Partnership for a Health Promotion Program at the Workplace
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Xiaofei Pei, PhD
,
Health and Productivity Research, Thomson Medstat, Washington, DC
Ron Z. Goetzel, PhD
,
Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Washington, DC
Meghan E. Short, BA
,
School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
Enid C. Roemer, PhD
,
Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Washington, DC
Daria Luisi, MPH, PhD
,
Wellness at Work Program, NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Kristin Quitoni, MPH, CHES
,
Bureau of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control Wellness at Work, New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, New York, NY
Maryam J. Tabrizi, MS, CHES
,
Health and Productivity Research, Thomson Medstat, Washington, DC
Rivka C. Liss-Levinson, BA
,
Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Washington, DC
Daniel K. Samoly, BS
,
Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Washington, DC
A growing body of literature indicates that workplace health promotion programs can have a positive impact on both health risk reduction and financial outcomes for employers. Supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Thomson Healthcare and the Institute for Health and Productivity Studies at Emory University evaluated the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene's (NYC DOHMH) Wellness at Work Program, supporting area employers in their efforts to design, implement, and evaluate evidence-based health promotion programs. Using a quasi-experimental approach, 27 sites from ten NYC public and private sector organizations were randomized into one of two treatment conditions: “high-intensity” and “moderate intensity.” Thirteen health risk factors (e.g., poor nutrition, smoking) weight-related outcomes measures (e.g., BMI, physical activity, nutrition) and financial outcomes (healthcare utilization, absenteeism, presenteeism) were analyzed for changes from 2005 to 2007 within and between treatment groups using a difference-in-difference approach and a GEE model that controls for confounding. Results show health risk reductions at all sites, especially “high-intensity” sites, but the differences between the treatments were not statistically significant. Results of financial outcomes demonstrate savings for all sites, but no significant differences were found between the two treatment conditions. Lack of significant findings between treatment conditions could be due to the relatively small cohort tracked over time and the short intervention period (two years). Nonetheless, these analyses demonstrate how private-public partnerships can lead to employee health risk reduction and financial savings for employers.
Learning Objectives: Describe how private and public partnership can work in health promotion and disease prevention
Articulate the incremental effect of comprehensive worksite health promotion intervention delivery models developed and implemented by the NYC DOHMH
Identify the future research opportunities and applications of the findings
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have been the Principal Investigator of this study. Over the past three years, I have been involved in every aspect of this study, including planning and implementing the program, and analyzing the results. I am the most qualified person to discuss the results of this program, including answering any difficult questions that may arise.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|