183761
Identifying Medicaid pregnant women at highest risk using latent class modeling and cluster analysis
Monday, October 27, 2008: 3:25 PM
Cristian Meghea, PhD
,
Institute for Health Care Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
H. Lynette Biery, PA-C
,
Institute for Health Care Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Lee Anne Roman, MSN, PhD
,
Dept. OBY/GYN and Institute for Health Care Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Jennifer E. Raffo, MA
,
Research, Grand Rapids Medical Education & Research Center, Grand Rapids, MI
Qi Zhu, MA
,
Institute for Health Care Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Objectives: Relying on depression and stress as gateways, we use Latent class analysis (LCA), a sophisticated statistical method, to identify pregnant women at highest risk for poor birth outcomes. We test whether a more clinically practical method, namely cluster analysis, risk stratifies women similarly to LCA. We then test whether women of the highest risk type are more likely to have poor birth outcomes. Materials and Methods: Pregnant women enrolled in enhanced prenatal services were surveyed through a risk screener now in effect statewide in Michigan Medicaid Enhanced Prenatal Services. Data include very detailed information on depression (ten questions on the Edinburgh scale - EPDS) and stress (four questions on the Perceived Stress Scale). LCA is used to stratify women into risk groups according to the pattern of their responses to the depression and stress questions. We then compare the latent subgroups by presenting descriptive statistics on risk factors and birth outcomes. We also perform a similar analysis, simply separating women into “not depressed” (EPDS score less than 9) or “depressed”, and compare the two subgroups along the same risk factors and birth outcomes. We will also use regression analysis to properly test whether the two methods of risk stratifying pregnant women using mental health as the gateway are, in fact, predictive of differences in poor birth outcomes between the different subgroups. Results: One of the two latent classes revealed by LCA is the highest risk subgroup: • Half the women (vs. only 11% in the other subgroup) have five or more risk factors. • Over 80% (vs. only 6% in the other subgroup) are likely to be depressed • Each of the modifiable health risks (smoking, alcohol use, and drug use) is more common. • Low birth weight and preterm birth are more common. The cluster analysis finds that depressed women (EPDS>=9) are the highest risk women: • Approximately 55% of the depressed women have five or more risk factors, compared to only approximately 11% among the other women • Depressed women are more likely to smoke, use alcohol, and use drugs • Low birth weight and preterm birth are more common among depressed women Conclusions: LCA and cluster analysis confirm our hypothesis that mental health is a gateway for identifying women with multiple risks and who are more likely to have an adverse birth outcome. LCA and the easier to implement cluster analysis yield similar results. The highest risk pregnant women can be very well identified based on a simple EPDS score cutoff.
Learning Objectives: 1. Identify two alternatives for identifying women at risk for poor birth outcomes
2. Develop and apply two risk stratifying procedures, namely latent class modeling and cluster analysis
3. Test whether the two methods of risk stratifying pregnant women are predictive of poor birth outcomes
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA
Ph.D., Economics, June 2004
Institute for Health Care Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Assistant Professor / Health Economist, since August 2006
• Write research papers for submission to peer-reviewed journals
• Statistical analysis using SAS and Stata packages.
• Lead externally-funded health services research projects, conduct health policy analyses and health policy research for decision-makers at local, state, and national levels
• Evaluate and review economic data for use in forecasting, planning and analysis health care costs, including federal and state legislation, economic policy and fiscal policy that affect health care in the state of Michigan and nationally
• Present work at professional meetings
• Directly participate in the effort of setting up an Health Services Research Division within the Institute
• Teach: student advisement, course instruction, curriculum development
American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
Senior Researcher, April 2004 – August 2006
• Write research papers for submission to peer-reviewed journals
• Statistical analysis using SAS and Stata packages. Datasets: Medicare claims, American College of Radiology Surveys, Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS), National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
• Present work at professional meetings
• Manage, review, and verify data collections, including surveys.
• Support, evaluate, and design research plans
• Collaborate with external contractors on projects (including advising students on co-authored papers)
"Prevalence of Productivity-Enhancing Technologies in Radiology” with Nikhil Nayak et al. Amer. J. of Roentgenology. June 2008.
“Determinants of Radiologist's Desired Workload.” Lead author, with Jonathan Sunshine. J. of Amer. Coll. of Rad. March 2007.
"The State of Teleradiology in 2003 and Changes since 1999" with Todd Ebbert et al. Amer. J. of Roentgenology. February 2007.
“Retirement Patterns and Plans of Radiologists in 2003” Lead author, with Jonathan Sunshine. Amer. J. of Roentgenology. December 2006.
“How Could the Radiologist Shortage Have Eased?” with Jonathan Sunshine. Amer. J. of Roentgenology. November 2006.
“Radiologists’ Reading Times Using PACS and Using Films: One Practice’s Experience” with Howard B. Fleishon and Mythreyi Bhargavan. Academic Radiology. April 2006.
“How Much Do Radiologists and Radiation Oncologists Subspecialize” Lead author, with Jonathan Sunshine. J. of Amer. Coll. of Rad. November 2005. 2: 906-913.
“Who’s Overworked and Who’s Underworked Among Radiologists.” Lead author, with Jonathan Sunshine. Radiology. September 2005. 236: 932-938
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|