184709 Utilization of a mobile safety center by low income, urban families

Monday, October 27, 2008

Andrea C. Gielen, ScD, ScM , Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Eileen McDonald, MS , Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH , Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Lara B. McKenzie, PhD, MA , Center for Injury Research and Policy, Columbus Children's Research Institute, Columbus, OH
Wendy C. Shields, MPH , Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
Maria T. Bulzacchelli, PhD , School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA
Mary Glenshaw, PhD, MPH , New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, Trenton, NJ
Background/Purpose: To examine the utilization of the Johns Hopkins CARES -- Children ARE Safe -- Mobile Safety Center (MSC), a 40 foot vehicle designed to deliver effective injury prevention interventions to low income, urban families.

Methods: Families enrolled on days when the MSC was at a community health center were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the Prescribed Group (PG) was prescribed an MSC visit; the Optional Group (OG) was encouraged to visit the MSC. Families enrolled on days when the MSC was not at the health center formed the Comparison Group (CG) and were given an MSC schedule. Follow up interviews were completed 2 weeks to 4 months later. 210 families with children ages 1 month to 7 years participated. The intervention was the provision of low cost safety products and personalized education as provided on the MSC, which replicates a home environment and contains interactive exhibits. Main outcome measures were: visit to the MSC, services and products obtained, and safety knowledge.

Results: Sixty-eight percent of the PG visited the MSC versus 41% of the OG versus 10% of the CG (p=.0005). Among visitors, 37% received a safety product; more than 30% received other services. Adjusted for income and education, MSC visitors versus non-visitors had higher knowledge scores (71% vs. 68%, p=.02). Among visitors, 96% reported learning something new, and 98% would recommend the MSC.

Conclusions: This approach to disseminating injury prevention interventions holds promise for enhancing the appeal of safety information and increasing the protection of children.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the ability of a mobile safety center to communicate safety information and disseminate safety products to low income urban families 2. Critique the strengths and weaknesses of conducting practice-based research in the context of health care delivery

Keywords: Children, Injury Prevention

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I was PI on the research being presented.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.