185770 Post-Abortion Care in Nepal: Disclosure Between Patients and Providers after Legalization

Monday, October 27, 2008

Tabetha R. Harken, MD, MPH , Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Services, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Ashma Rana, MD , Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
Kasturi Malla, MD , Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Prasuti Griha Government Maternity Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
Mahesh Puri, PhD, MSc , Centre for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
Philip Darney, MD, MSc , University of California, San Francisco, Bixby Center for Reproductive Health, Research & Policy, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Jillian T. Henderson, PhD, MPH , OB-GYN, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Until 2002, abortion was illegal in Nepal and provision and acquisition of termination services were treated as criminal offenses. Maternal mortality rates were among the highest in the world, owing in part to unsafe abortion. Legal reform and an abortion training and certification program have improved abortion safety. However, women with complications from unsafe induced abortions continue to present to hospitals in the Kathmandu Valley. Despite the fact that patient disclosure of induced abortion may be critical to receiving appropriate medical treatment, many providers note that patients and abortion providers often conceal the details of these complicated abortions. Health care providers' perspectives were examined to explore factors that may influence patient and provider willingness to disclose. Key-informant interviews were conducted with physicians, nurses, and counselors who care for abortion patients and with hospital administrators involved in framing abortion care policy at two major urban hospitals in the Kathmandu Valley (n = 24). Transcripts from semi-structured interviews were coded for content and theme. Providers believed that patient willingness to disclose was related to awareness of the legal status of abortion, degree of privacy provided during exams, counseling on the importance of disclosure for medical treatment, treatment by the medical staff, and societal stigma of abortion. Interviewees noted that fear of patient party retribution, damage to reputation, and lack of a protected environment for disclosure are reasons providers may conceal their involvement. Identification of these factors can inform interventions to improve patient–provider trust and confidentiality in the context of abortion care.

Learning Objectives:
1)Describe how patient disclosure can affect medical care 2)Discuss possible factors that influence patients and providers to disclose the nature of their induced abortion

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am an Obstetrician-Gynecologist who is currently in the second year of my Family Planning Fellowship at the University of California, San Francisco. I am doing research with the guidance of Dr.s Jillian Henderson and Philip Darney on abortion complications in Nepal pre and post legalization with the collaboration of local Nepali investigators who are listed as authors on this paper.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.