197779
Mitigating Systematic Measurement Error in Comparative Effectiveness Research for Children
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Adam C. Carle, MA, PhD
,
Health Policy and Clinical Effectiveness, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
US minority children and children from low socioeconomic status (SES) and non-English speaking homes suffer health disparities. Accurately evaluating children's health requires sound measurement. Yet, little research explores the psychometric properties of children's health estimates derived from the primary surveys and measures used to understand children's health. Less research addresses the possibility that systematic measurement error influences research. Measurement bias refers to the possibility that individuals with identical health respond dissimilarly to questions about their health as a function of their race, ethnicity, SES, or language. Bias can obscure differences, decrease reliability and validity, and render comparisons impossible. Without establishing equivalent measurement across heterogeneous backgrounds, the field cannot comparatively evaluate what works best for whom, support evidence-based care, and address disparities. I will apply latent variable models to examine the measurement of health conditions among children (e.g., depression, generalized anxiety disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder) using data from the primary surveys used to understand children's health (e.g., National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, National Survey of Children's Health). I will establish the measures' psychometric properties; examine bias' role across diverse populations (e.g., race, ethnicity, SES, language), and assess bias' influence on comparative effectiveness research. I will develop a model-based correction to mitigate bias' influence. Findings will address bias as an impediment to comparative effectiveness research and clarify whether children's outcomes differ across racial, ethnic, and SES backgrounds. This will promote efforts: to conduct comparative effectiveness research, apply and advance evidence-based practice and policy, improve and understand children's health, and eradicate disparities.
Learning Objectives: At the end of the session, participants will be able to:
1. Define measurement bias.
2. Explain the importance of establishing equivalent measurement across individuals with diverse sociodemographic backgrounds when conducting comparative research.
3. Discuss how measurement bias can impede comparative effectiveness and disparities research.
4. Identify latent variable modeling techniques to investigate measurement bias.
5. Describe how latent variable modeling techniques can mitigate bias’ influence.
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: In the past 4 years, I have published over 20 peer-reviewed articles and delivered over 30 national and international research presentations. Several of these have addressed latent variable modeling. For the research presented here, I worked individually, conducted the literature searches and summaries of previous related work, undertook the statistical analyses, and developed the presentation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|