199988 Neighborhoods Working in Partnership: Building capacity of adults and youth for policy change in Detroit - Challenges and Lessons Learned

Tuesday, November 10, 2009: 1:30 PM

Richard Lichtenstein, PhD, MPH , School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Angela Reyes, MPH , Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation, Detroit, MI
Barbara Israel, DrPH MPH , Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Chris M. Coombe, PhD, MPH , Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Robert McGranaghan, MPH , School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Amy J. Schulz, PhD MPH , Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Conja Wright, MLIS , Detroit Public Library, Detroit, MI
There have been increasing calls for community-academic-practice partnerships to have a broader effect on health through engaging the participation of community members in policy advocacy. Neighborhoods Working in Partnership: Building Capacity for Policy Change (NWP), a project of the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC) in partnership with PolicyLink, aims to enhance the capacity of neighborhood residents and organizations to engage in the policy change process to positively impact the health of families in Detroit. The URC is a community-based participatory research partnership which builds upon the strengths of the communities involved, to conduct etiologic research, public health interventions, and policy advocacy aimed at understanding and addressing health inequities.

Drawing upon qualitative and quantitative evaluation data, this presentation addresses the challenges, facilitating factors, and lessons learned from the development and implementation of a 4-session series of workshops facilitated by community and academic trainers in 7 Detroit neighborhoods with approximately 225 participants - -almost half of whom were youth. The challenges we experienced included: dealing with logistics (e.g., conducting four-session training programs in different communities); developing the curriculum (choosing appropriate policy examples), and, integrating adults and youth in the same training sessions. The facilitating factors and lessons learned from conducting these sessions involved: time management for small group policy exercises; community trainer selection; integration of training sessions where communities were already organizing around policy objectives; and, the importance of working within a well-functioning community-academic partnership. Based on results presented, we will discuss implications for conducting policy advocacy capacity building efforts.

Learning Objectives:
As a result of this presentation, participants will be able to: 1. Discuss the challenges of training community residents to become active participants in the policy process. 2. Identify key facilitating factors for conducting an effective community-based training program on the policy process. 3. Formulate and present policy process concepts and strategies to inter- generational community stakeholders

Keywords: Community-Based Public Health, Advocacy

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: 35 years as a faculty member in a School of Public Health with considerable community and policy experience
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.