200737
Neighborhoods working in partnership: Enhancing the capacity of community residents to engage in policy advocacy
Tuesday, November 10, 2009: 12:30 PM
Barbara A. Israel, DrPH
,
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
Angela Reyes, MPH
,
Detroit Hispanic Development Corporation, Detroit, MI
Chris M. Coombe, PhD, MPH
,
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Robert McGranaghan, MPH
,
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Michael Spencer, PhD
,
School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Lula Odom
,
Carat, NBEJN, Detroit, MI
Rebecca Flournoy, MPH
,
The PolicyLink Center for Health and Place, PolicyLink, Oakland, CA
Donele Wilkins
,
Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice, Detroit, MI
There have been increasing calls for community-academic-practice partnerships to have a broader effect on health through engaging the participation of community members in policy advocacy. Neighborhoods Working in Partnership: Building Capacity for Policy Change (NWP), a project of the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC) in partnership with PolicyLink, aims to enhance the capacity of neighborhood residents and organizations to engage in the policy change process to positively impact the health of families in Detroit. The URC is a community-based participatory research partnership which builds upon the strengths of the communities involved, to conduct etiologic research, public health interventions, and policy advocacy aimed at understanding and addressing health inequities. The goals of the NWP are to: strengthen policy advocacy skills within local neighborhoods; extend community voices into the policy making arena; and impact policies aimed at creating healthy neighborhoods. In this presentation, we will provide a rationale for NWP, and discuss the process used which included: 3 Train-the-Trainers workshops conducted by PolicyLink with over fifty participants; and a 4-session series of workshops carried out by community and academic trainers in 7 neighborhoods in Detroit with approximately 225 participants – almost half of whom were youth. We will describe and analyze the: content of the curriculum; process of developing and tailoring the curriculum for different neighborhoods, languages, adults, youth; recruitment procedures; and methods used to evaluate the workshops. We will discuss lessons learned regarding implementation of a training program (e.g., curricular design issues), and implications for conducting policy advocacy capacity building efforts.
Learning Objectives: 1.Discuss the rationale for involving community residents in policy advocacy aimed at promoting health.
2.Describe the process used by the “Neighborhoods Working in Partnership” program to strengthen the capacity and skills of community members to conduct effective public health advocacy.
3.Analyze the process of developing and tailoring the curriculum for the different neighborhoods, languages, adults and youth.
4.Articulate lessons learned regarding implementation of a training program and implications for conducting policy advocacy capacity building efforts.
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Doctorate in Pubic Health; Principal Investigator of the project being discussed
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|