201109 Neighborhoods Working in Partnership: Assessing the Impact of a Policy Advocacy Training Project

Tuesday, November 10, 2009: 1:00 PM

Rebecca Cheezum, MPH , School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Akosua Burris, BA , Detroit Edison Public School Academy, Detroit, MI
Chris M. Coombe, PhD, MPH , Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Barbara Israel, DrPH MPH , Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Robert McGranaghan, MPH , School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Ashley O'Toole, MPH/MSW , University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Michael Anderson , REACH-Detroit Partnership, Detroit, MI
There have been increasing calls for community-academic-practice partnerships to have a broader effect on health through engaging the participation of community members in policy advocacy. Neighborhoods Working in Partnership: Building Capacity for Policy Change (NWP), a project of the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC) in partnership with PolicyLink, aims to enhance the capacity of neighborhood residents and organizations to engage in the policy change process to positively impact the health of families in Detroit. The URC is a community-based participatory research partnership which builds upon the strengths of the communities involved, to conduct etiologic research, public health interventions, and policy advocacy aimed at understanding and addressing health inequities.

In this presentation, we will describe and analyze the results from an impact evaluation of the NWP project that involved a 4-session series of workshops carried out by community and academic trainers in 7 neighborhoods in Detroit with approximately 225 participants – almost half of whom were youth. We conducted eight group interviews (four each with adults and youth) five months after the workshops with participants who had attended at least two training sessions and were involved in policy advocacy activities. We will describe the data collection and analysis methods used. Findings will be presented, including: impact of training on participants' policy activities; facilitating factors and barriers that affect community residents' ability to engage in policy efforts; and recommendations for future training. We will discuss lessons learned and how the results can inform strategies to increase community residents' involvement in policy advocacy.

Learning Objectives:
Discuss the selection criteria and methods for conducting group interviews with NWP participants who are engaged in policy advocacy activities. Describe facilitating factors and barriers that impact community residents’ engagement in policy advocacy activities. Articulate recommendations to increase community residents’ engagement in policy advocacy activities.

Keywords: Community, Policy/Policy Development

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Participated in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of policy advocacy trainings for community trainers, community members, and graduate students.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.