202642 Farm-to-School Programs: Linkages between state laws , district policies, and school practices

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Linda Schneider, MS , Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Jamie F. Chriqui, PhD, MHS , Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Lindsey Turner, PhD , Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Frank Chaloupka, PhD , Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Background: Farm-to-School programs (FTSP) connect schools with locally-sourced food.

Purpose: To study the prevalence of FTSP and links with state legislation and school district policies.

Significance: FTSP have the potential to improve student health by increasing access to fresh produce and by improving the nutritional quality of school meals.

Methodology: We gathered information on FTS laws for all 50 states plus DC, district policies in a nationally-representative sample of 529 school districts (LEAs), and school information via a mail-back survey of 578 public elementary schools within those LEAs.

Findings: As of 2007, 13 states had legislation supporting FTSP. In 5.6% of LEAs, policies were in place to require or recommend FTSP. At the school level, 5.1% of schools reported having a FTSP. Schools with FTSP were more prevalent in states with FTS laws than without (9.6% vs. 2.7%), and in LEAs with policies than without (14.6% vs. 4.2%). FTSP were more common in the Northeast (11.4% of schools) as compared to the West (5.3%), Midwest (1.5%) and South (4.5%). Among schools with FTSP, most offered fruits (80.6 %), vegetables (74.2%), or dairy (9.7%).

Conclusion: Although few schools have established FTSP, these programs are more common where there is state and/or district support.

Recommendations: FTSP present a unique opportunity for farmers and schools by creating new marketing outlets for farmers, while improving the school nutrition environment. Enacting more FTS state legislation may facilitate increased FTS participation by schools.

Learning Objectives:
Identify Farm to School Programs and which schools are most likely to participate

Keywords: Food and Nutrition, School Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I assisted with data collection efforts for data to be presented. I have collaborated with team members in preparing the abstract and will be involved in future presentations and manuscripts.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.