203989 Evaluation of West Virginia local wellness policies

Tuesday, November 10, 2009: 9:00 AM

Stephanie S. Frost, MA , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Carole V. Harris, PhD , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Andrew S. Bradlyn, PhD , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Nancy O'Hara Tompkins, PhD , Prevention Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Laurie Abildso, MS , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Jessica Coffman, MA , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Lucas C. Moore, EdD , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Don Chapman, MS , Office of Healthy School, West Virginia Department of Education, Charleston, WV
Melanie Purkey, MS , Office of Healthy School, West Virginia Department of Education, Charleston, WV
Background: The Child Nutrition and Reauthorization Act CNRA) of 2004 required districts participating in the USDA school meals program to develop a local wellness policy (LWP).

Significance: LWPs are a mechanism for addressing childhood obesity through school-based nutrition and physical activity (PA) programs.

Purpose: This paper summarizes the findings from an evaluation of West Virginia's 55 county LWPs and examines superintendent reports of LWP implementation and quality.

Method: Each LWP was independently evaluated by three reviewers using a 55-item measure with 12 subscales: CRNA goals, nutrition guidelines, parent nutrition, school meals, vending, fundraising & rewards, student physical education (PE), school based PA, PE/PA for parents, health promotion, policy assessment & evaluation, and assessment data utilization. Composite scores were calculated by totaling the number of criterion items mentioned in LWPs.

Results: Total scores ranged from 24-87, with an average of 59. Sub-scale scores were highest for CRNA goals and school meals and lowest for PE/PA programs for parents/community and utilization of assessment data. When superintendents were asked to rate the quality of LWP components, more than 70% indicated nutrition education, PE, nutrition guidelines, and PA components were good or excellent, while more than 60% rated parent nutrition education, parent PA/PE and staff wellness components to be fair or poor. Correlations between LWP subscale ratings and superintendent component ratings were not significant.

Conclusions: LWP evaluations identified key areas where policies can be strengthened to support childhood obesity prevention. Implications of the lack of correspondence between superintendent ratings and policy evaluations are discussed.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe a methodology for evaluating Local Wellness Policies (LWPs). 2. Compare LWP evaluation results to school superintendents’ perceptions of the quality of their districts’ LWPs. 3. Discuss key areas for improvement in LWP development.

Keywords: School-Based Programs, Obesity

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am a third year doctoral student in Public Health Sciences and I have been a member of the team conducting the evaluation of West Virginia's Healthy Lifestyles Act (legislation addressing childhood obesity through school policy) funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.