204695 Discussing intrauterine contraception at the family planning visit: A (missed) opportunity for client education

Wednesday, November 11, 2009: 9:30 AM

Sarah L. Schwartz, MPH , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
M. Antonia Biggs, PhD , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Sue Holtby, MPH , Public Health Institute, Santa Cruz, CA
Christy McCain, MPH , Public Health Institute, Santa Cruz, CA
Daria P. Rostovtseva, MS , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Claire Brindis, DrPH , Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
The modern IUC is a highly effective, safe, long-acting, reversible method of contraception with few side effects and high user satisfaction. While the IUC is the most widely used contraceptive method worldwide, less than 2% of sexually active women in the US use this method. California's Family PACT program recently implemented efforts to expand IUC use. Using data from a representative survey (N=1497) of Family PACT clients interviewed immediately after their family planning visit, we explored provider and client characteristics associated with discussing IUCs at the visit. Among a sample of 1265 non-pregnant female clients, 27% reported that the provider discussed the IUC method with them that day. Clients 20 and older were more likely than teens to report discussing IUCs with their providers (29% vs. 19%, p<0.01). Clients seen at private sector providers were more likely than those seen at public sector providers to discuss IUCs (35% vs. 22%, p<0.001), and clients seen at primary care or multi-specialty providers were more likely than those seen at family planning-only providers to discuss IUCs (33% vs. 22%, p<0.001). Very few clients (4%) were using IUCs before the interview visit, and just 2% switched from lower efficacy methods of contraception to an IUC at the visit. 42% of clients listed “not knowing enough about the method” as a reason for not using an IUC, pointing to the need for improved client education. Further research should evaluate the reasons for disparities between age, provider sectors, and specialties in discussing IUC with clients.

Learning Objectives:
1) Describe provider and patient characteristics associated with discussing intrauterine contraception at the family planning visit 2) Explain the most frequent reasons reported by family planning clients for not using an IUC 3) Discuss opportunities for IUC promotion via provider education

Keywords: Contraceptives, Access and Services

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I conduct evaluation studies of family planning services and teen pregnancy prevention programs, based at the University of California, San Francisco. I have a master’s degree in public health from UC Berkeley.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.