205145 Translation of SBIRT technology from research to medical settings: Cross-site evaluation

Monday, November 9, 2009: 12:48 PM

Bonnie G. McRee, MPH , Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
Frances Delboca, PhD , Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
Janice Vendetti, MPH , Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT
Manu Singh, PhD , JBS International, Inc., North Bethesda, MD
Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is a comprehensive, integrated, public health approach to the delivery of early intervention and brief focused treatment services for persons with substance use disorders, as well as those at risk of developing them. The dominant research-to-practice model previously relied on a generalist provider framework in which in-house general medical staff are trained to conduct evidenced-based screening and early intervention activities. However, relying solely on in-house generalists did not produce the expected uptake of research-based interventions for patients in need so that new approaches were needed.

This presentation will examine the effect of three primary implementation models on performance indicators including screening rates, brief interventions delivered, brief treatment referrals, and referrals to other services. It will also explore whether some implementation models are more effective (with respect to performance indicators) in some settings than in other others (e.g., outpatient clinics, in-patient hospitals and emergency or trauma departments). Finally, the relationship of these performance indicators on various structural, organizational and cultural variables (e.g., size of health care organization, volume of patients, number of SBIRT trained professionals, education level of trained staff, staffing patterns, provider characteristics, and cultural and political climates influencing the program) will be presented.

Data collected incorporates qualitative and quantitative measures including interviews with key stakeholders, administrators and direct service providers as well as direct observation of SBIRT services. Grantee GPRA data was collected to assess critical site level performance indicators and will be analyzed using a mixed methods approach.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the effect of three primary SBIRT implementation models on performance indicators and explain how these models change as implementation proceeds 2. Discuss whether some SBIRT implementation models are more effective in some settings than in others. 3. Evaluate the relations of certain performance indicators to various structural, organizational and cultural variables.

Keywords: Substance Abuse Treatment, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have read the APHA policy on full disclosure and I declare that: I wish to disclose that I have NO financial interests or other relationship with the manufacturers of commercial products, suppliers of commercial services or commercial supporters WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT JBS International, Inc., RTI, Inc., the University of Connecticut, and The Avisa Group and were funded by the Center for Susbstance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to be part of a cross-site evaluation team to conduct a cross-site evaluation of CSAT’s SBIRT grantees.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.