206194 Disability statistics for the states: The American Community Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Scott Grosse, PhD , Division of Human Development and Disability, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Brian S. Armour, PhD , NCBDDD/DHDD/Disability and Health Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Elizabeth A. Courtney-Long, MA, MSPH , SAIC contractor for NCBDDD/DHDD Disability and Health Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Vince Campbell, PhD , Acting Chief, Disability and Health Branch, Division of Human Development and Disabilities, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Different measures of disability result in varying estimates of prevalence, and assessing the comparability of measures from different datasets is essential. Two datasets can be used to calculate the prevalence of disability at the State level. The Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) annually samples more than 500,000 households and uses a series of questions to identify distinct domains of disability. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is conducted by the CDC and state health departments and includes roughly 350,000 adults. The BRFSS includes two questions on activity limitations and use of assistive devices. In 2007, the average prevalence of disability for adults was 17.0% in the ACS and 20.0% in the BRFSS. Among the 50 States and the District of Columbia, adult disability prevalence in the ACS ranged from 13.5% in New Jersey to 26.7% in West Virginia and in the BRFSS ranged from 15.6% in North Dakota to 25.8% in West Virginia. The simple correlation coefficient between the two series was 0.76. Although the ranking of states in prevalence of disability was not identical, most states with relatively low or high rankings on one indicator were also low or high on the other. It appears that both the ACS and BRFSS disability indicators reflect the same underlying construct. The BRFSS can be used to examine health disparities among people with disabilities and the ACS can be used to study demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the population with disabilities, including at the local level.

Learning Objectives:
Compare the two major datasets that can be used to calculate disabilty statistics for states and assess the contributions of each

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: PhD in public health, 12 years of experience at CDC, 50+ publications
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.