206535 Communicating occupational and genetic risk factors research results to agricultural pesticide handlers in Washington State

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Rad Cunningham, MPH/MPA Student , Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Coby Jansen, MPH Candidate , School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Kristin Beima, MPH , Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Maria Negrete, BA , Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Yakima, WA
Kelly Fryer-Edwards, MA, PhD , Medical History and Ethics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Pablo Palmandez, MS , Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Yakima, WA
Jonathan Hofmann, MPH , Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Matthew Keifer, MD, MPH , Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
In 2006, we began a study to evaluate occupational and genetic risk factors for cholinesterase (ChE) inhibition among organophosphate-exposed agricultural pesticide handlers in Washington State. Almost all study participants are Latino (>99%), and most were educated in Mexico (90.3%). Outreach efforts with individual test results have had limited success. We are currently planning and developing outreach strategies regarding preliminary study results.

Communicating PON1 status and its likely effect is a particularly sensitive and challenging issue for ethical and safety reasons. Language and cultural barriers and the limited formal education of most study participants make outreach challenging, particularly regarding individual sensitivity and the complex biology involved in OP metabolism. Although our study has shown a positive association between PON1 status and cholinesterase inhibition, the preliminary findings are not yet conclusive which makes communicating results to participants challenging.

Outreach methods have included: mailing letters or calling participants with results of genetic tests; follow-up interviews with handlers to assess their understanding of genetic risk factors; sharing occupational risk factor information with the authors of a best practices manual; and health education videos shown at the clinic. The researchers have used participant feedback to refine dissemination methods and communicate more effectively. The goal of this poster is to share methods that we found to be successful, unsuccessful or mixed, so that other researchers can learn from our models and more effectively communicate research results to their stakeholders.

Our study provides an important examination of the ethical and research implications of communicating preliminary results.

Learning Objectives:
Learning Objectives Assess effectiveness of various health education methods as applied to preliminary genetic research findings, as used with agricultural pesticide handlers Evaluate research implications of communicating intermediate results considering benefits, confounding, and quality of information Evaluate the ethical issues surrounding the communication of un-corroborated genetic results

Keywords: Pesticide Exposure, Agricultural Work Safety

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: 1st year concurrent MPH/MPA student at the University of Washington in Environmental and Occupational Health Reasarch Assistant - University of Wahington Jan '09 - Present Occupational Exposure to Organophosphate Pesticides Technical Advisor - The Carter Center 10/06 - 6/08 -Coordinated mass health education activities across Warrab State -Six day community entry/participatory rural analysis (PRA) workshop Peace Corps Volunteer, Paraguay 1/04 - 4/06 -Youth and adult health promotion education. -HIV/AIDS Conference coordinator, Asuncion, Jan 2005
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.