207650 Pollution Prevention and Toxic Releases in Appalachia: Insights from the Toxics Release Inventory

Wednesday, November 11, 2009: 9:15 AM

Daniel Ferguson , Division of Environmental Health, Sevier County Health Department, Sevierville, TN
Nicole Holder , ETSU Department of Mathematics, ETSU, Johnson CIty, TN
Ken Silver, SM, DSc , Department of Environmental Health, ETSU College of Public Health, Johnson City, TN
John P. Lilly , Division of Remediation, Tennessee Department of Environmental Conservation, Mountain Home, TN
OBJECTIVE: Appalachia, a region delineated as 410 counties across 13 states, had 2,564 facilities reporting to EPA's Toxics Release Inventory in 2002. Releases and pollution prevention practices were compared to facilities in non-Appalachian counties. Analyses were also performed at the level of subregion (North, Central, South) to minimize confounding by government policies and to explore heterogeneity.

METHODS: Statistical tests included the Kruskal-Wallis test of analysis of variance, binomial test for confidence intervals and two proportions, log linear maximum likelihood analysis of variance, and interaction plots of log transformed data.

RESULTS: Median total releases were significantly higher for facilities in Appalachia than non-Appalachian facilities (5,267 vs. 4,049 lbs., p = 0.002). Significantly more likely were releases into surface water (p<0.001) and on-site disposal of toxic waste (p=0.003).

Releases into all environmental media, as well as total releases, from facilities in Northern Appalachia were significantly higher than their non-Appalachian counterparts (1.6 to 10.7-fold, all p<0.001). Facilities in certain SIC codes were associated with higher total releases when located in Appalachia. In a log-linear model subregions differed significantly in the use of worker participatory methods, with establishments in the Northern subregion most frequently reporting the use of worker participation (10%).

CONCLUSIONS: This systematic study suggests that the Appalachian region may be disparately impacted by toxic releases. Further investigation could provide a basis for designing educational and regulatory interventions for pollution prevention in this oft-neglected region.

Learning Objectives:
1. Discuss the rationale for the hypothesis that toxic releases could be higher in Appalachian counties than in non-Appalachian counties. 2. Evaluate the evidence that toxic releases are higher in Appalachia.

Keywords: Environmental Justice, Environmental Health Hazards

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: Have presented at several meetings in the past. Student-Faculty Collaborative Research Grant, Pollution Prevention Opportunities in Appalachia: Insights from the Toxics Release Inventory, Spring 2004. Ferguson, D. and Silver, K., Pollution Prevention in Appalachia: Insights from the Toxics Release Inventory [POSTER]. Primary Care Research Day, ETSU School of Medicine, Johnson City, TN September 10, 2005 Ferguson, D. and Silver, K., Toxics Release Inventory for Tennessee: Pollution Prevention Trends and Opportunities. Primary Care Research Day, ETSU School of Medicine, Johnson City, TN September 11, 2004 Ferguson, D. and Silver, K., Toxics Release Inventory for Tennessee: Pollution Prevention Trends and Opportunities. Southern Appalachian Man and Biosphere Conference, Gatlinburg, TN, November 16, 2004 Testimony on right to know, U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Small Business, June, 1985 Testimony on right to know, Vermont State Legislature, January 1985
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.