209233 A comparison of risk behaviors of non-gay-identified with gay-identified black men who have sex with men at Historically Black College and University Settings

Tuesday, November 10, 2009: 8:50 AM

Peter E. Thomas, PhD, MPH , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA
Kirk D. Henny, PhD , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Andrew C. Voetsch, PhD , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA
Alexandra M. Oster, MD , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Denyce Callaway, PhD , Howard University Student Health Center, Howard University, Washington, DC
Michelle Smith, PhD , Jefferson Comprehensive Care System, Inc., Little Rock, AR
Lynette Mundey, MD , Howard University Student Health Center, Howard University, Washington, DC
Kaye Sly, PhD , Psychology, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS
James Powell, MS , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA
Mattie Shiloh, RN, MSN , Student Health Services, Albany State University, Albany, GA
Binwei Song, MS , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC-NCHHSTP, Atlanta, GA
Pilgrim S. Spikes, PhD, MPH, MSW , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention - Research Prevention Branch, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA
Greg Millet, MPH , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention - Research Prevention Branch, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA
James Heffelfinger, MD, MPH , Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, CDC-NCHHSTP, Atlanta, GA
Background: Black men who have sex with men (MSM), including bisexuals, represented 41% of the nearly 25,000 new HIV infections among blacks in 2006. We compared behaviors of non-gay/bisexual-identified MSM (NGI-MSM) with behaviors of gay/bisexual-identified MSM (GI-MSM) at historically black college and university (HBCU) settings.

Methods: Using convenience sampling, we recruited HIV testing participants to complete behavioral surveys at HBCUs in Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, and Washington, DC, from 2005 to 2007. Black males who reported ³ 1 male partner in the previous 12 months were included in this analysis.

Results: Of 1930 black males surveyed, 270 (14%) reported ³ 1 male partner, of whom 79 (29%) self-identified as gay, 67 (25%) as bisexual, 96 (36%) as heterosexual, and 28 (10%) as other/don't know/not applicable/refused. NGI-MSM were not different from GI-MSM in total number of partners in the previous 12 months or proportion reporting unprotected receptive anal intercourse. Compared with GI-MSM, NGI-MSM were less likely to report asking their last partner's HIV status (odds ratio [OR]=0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.3-0.9) and having been tested for HIV in the previous 12 months (OR=0.6, CI=0.3-0.9) and more likely to report not using a condom during last sex (OR=1.8, CI=1.2-3.4), having had sex with a female in the previous 12 months, (OR=4.1, CI=2.5-6.9), and perceiving they were at no risk for HIV infection (OR=3.1, CI=1.5-6.3).

Conclusion: More NGI-MSM reported high-risk behaviors and fewer reported HIV preventive behaviors than GI-MSM. Findings suggest that interventions should be developed to reach non-gay-identified black MSM.

Learning Objectives:
1) Describe HIV risk behaviors of African American Men interviewed in Historically Black College and University Settings. 2) Compare rapid HIV testing and HIV risk behaviors among black male survey respondents. 3) Identify differences in sexual orientation and sexual behavior among survey respondents and how these classifications are associated with different HIV risk and HIV prevention behaviors. 4) Discuss the importance of distinguishing gay-identified from non-gay-identified black men who have sex with men (MSM) .

Keywords: Sexual Risk Behavior, African American

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I have an MPH in Intl reprodcutice health, a PhD in epidemiology, almost 20 years of experience in reproductive health and several years of experience in HIV/AIDS field.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.