209298
What a difference a day makes: Undue burden of the 24-hour waiting period
Monday, November 9, 2009: 1:30 PM
As of February, 2009, 33 states require women to receive counseling before terminating a pregnancy. Twenty-four of those states also require that a specified amount of time, generally 24 hours, elapse after counseling before the procedure can take place. Seven states require that all counseling be provided in-person prior to the waiting period, necessitating two separate trips to the facility. This month both Kentucky (passing a new in-person counseling rule) and South Carolina (considering a 24-hour wait after an ultrasound) are considering legislation that would result in two trips. Proponents of these bills state women need to be fully informed and must reflect on their decisions. Opponents say women already reflect, and these bills further chip away at access to services. In largely rural states, these restrictions can cause real hardship and pose an undue burden. The number of providers across the nation has steadily declined. In Kentucky, there are only two clinics for the entire state, both situated in major metropolitan areas. Likewise, in South Carolina, there are only three clinics also centered in metropolitan areas. According to the Guttmacher Institute, in the southern region of the US, 21% of women terminating pregnancies travel at least 50 miles, and 10% travel more than 100 miles. 77% of Kentucky women and 72% of South Carolina women live in counties without a provider, meaning many women seeking services will require hundreds of dollars of extra expenses for gas, meals, hotels, child care, and lost wages from work.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe the extra costs women who live far from service sites face; and
2. Discuss the arguments for and against 24-hour delay policies.
Keywords: Abortion, Access
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I hold a PhD in Health Behavior/Education and have over 20 years of experience in programming and research related to women's health issues. I am currently directing a project to increase access to reproductive health services in South Carolina.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|