212333 A descriptive spatial analysis of multiple health-related resources in Baltimore, New York City, and Winston-Salem

Monday, November 9, 2009

Melissa J. Smiley, MUP, MPH , Department of Epidemiology, Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Ana V. Diez Roux, MD, PhD , Department of Epidemiology, Center for Integrative Approaches to Health Disparities, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Shannon J. Brines, MEng , School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Daniel G. Brown, PhD , School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Kelly R. Evenson, PhD , Department of Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Daniel A. Rodriguez, PhD , Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Background: Resource access may contribute to widening health disparities. Research has established that some resources, like supermarkets, are less prevalent in minority areas. There is little empirical evidence using spatial analytic techniques on the patterning of multiple health-related resources. Methods: We geocoded locations of supermarkets, recreational facilities, parks, and retail areas in New York City (819 block groups), Baltimore (737), and Forsyth County, NC (169). We constructed 1/2 mile kernel densities of resources as indicators of locational access to healthy foods, recreational resources, and land-use mix. Densities were analyzed individually and collectively as a summary score. Correlation coefficients and Moran's I statistics quantified statistical and spatial resource clustering. Spatial regression models were fit to estimate the relationship between block group race and resource access, while accounting for spatial correlation. Results: After adjusting for population density, access to different resources was positively correlated (0.09 to 0.62, p<.05 for all) except for access to parks which was not correlated with other resources. Spatial autocorrelation varied across resource and site (Moran's I from 0.08 to 0.95) and was highest in New York. Spatial regression models showed significant negative relationships between percent minority and resource access. In Baltimore, the relationship was more significant for the summary score (-10.2, p<.0001) than any one individual resource. Discussion: There is evidence of clustering in locational access to resources, suggesting that some areas are deficient in multiple resources. The pattern of clustering is dependent on area race/ethnicity and the metropolitan area studied.

Learning Objectives:
1) Describe clustering of health-related resources (supermarkets, recreational facilities, retail areas) in three metropolitan settings 2) Describe racial patterning in locational access to health-related resources (supermarkets, recreational facilities, retail areas) 3) Demonstrate a novel approach to spatial analysis of resource access

Keywords: Geographic Information Systems, Measuring Social Inequality

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: These are data that I am analyzing as part of my doctoral dissertation research.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.