212597 Monitoring H1N1 Activity in Maryland Using Syndromic Surveillance

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Heather N. Brown, MPH , Office of Preparedness and Response, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, MD
Sadia Aslam, MPH , Office of Preparedness and Response, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, MD
Isaac Ajit, MBChB, MPH , Office of Preparedness and Response, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, MD
Sherry Adams, RN, CPM , Office of Preparedness and Response, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, MD
Background: In April 2009, cases of novel influenza A virus (H1N1) were identified across the United States, prompting states to increase surveillance activities to detect cases of the novel virus. Maryland used its electronic syndromic surveillance system to monitor H1N1 activity throughout the state and inform decision-makers.

Methods: Through the surveillance system, emergency department visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) and over-the-counter sales of respiratory medications were reviewed closely on a daily basis throughout the initial H1N1 response. The Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH) used its syndromic surveillance system as a tool to enhance case finding efforts as well as to monitor levels of ILI across the state. Daily reports were provided to state executives to enhance situational awareness and inform decision-making.

Results: Emergency department visits for ILI spiked during the initial H1N1 outbreak. A statistically significant increase in ILI occurred for 10 consecutive days from April 26, 2009 to May 6, 2009. The peak of emergency department visits for ILI occurred on April 30, 2009, on which there was a 4.5 fold increase compared to the same date in 2008.

Discussion: Syndromic surveillance proved to be a vital tool in supporting decision-makers by providing timely and ongoing situational awareness of the initial H1N1 outbreak. This data indicated that although there was a large increase in emergency department visits for ILI during the initial outbreak, hospitals were not completely overwhelmed. DHMH is continuing to monitor this data closely to maintain situational awareness of ILI activity in Maryland.

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the utilization of syndromic surveillance to monitor H1N1 activity. 2. Discuss the analysis of influenza-like illness data from emergency departments during the initial H1N1 outbreak. 3. Explain how syndromic surveillance data was used to inform decision making in Maryland.

Keywords: Surveillance, Emerging Diseases

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: as Deputy Director for the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of Preparedness and Response, I oversee state biosurveillance activities.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.