Oral

The burden of disease and the social costs associated with environmental contamination is the subject of heated debate for both scientists and policy makers alike. The public perception of the issue often influences the discussion on environmental policy and action. For policy makers, it is important to weigh the potential costs and benefits associated with aggressive environmental protection legislation. Specific topics to be covered include: lead contamination, drinking water disinfection, coastal water contamination, integrating health impact assessment (HIA) into the federal environmental impact statement (EIS), and the utility of environmental indicators. Understanding the legal framework for addressing public health and environmental justice can facilitate environmental planning and regulatory processes. When data is available, strategies such as Health Impact Assessment can ensure health-focused public policy. When the scientific data is uncertain, policy makers should work with strategies such as the Precautionary Principle to reform environmental regulation.

Session Objectives: •Describe the burden of disease and the social costs associated with environmental contamination •Identify ways in which public perception influences debate on environmental policy and action •Analyze the possible costs benefits associated with aggressive environmental protection policies

CE Credits: Medical (CME), Health Education (CHES), Nursing (CNE), Public Health (CPH)