214887 Evaluation of a hearing conservation program for farm youth: A 16-year follow-up

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM

Barbara Marlenga, PhD , National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI
Richard L. Berg, MS , Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI
James G. Linneman, BA , Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI
Douglas J. Wood, AuD, CCC-A , Audiology, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI
Steven Kirkhorn, MD , National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI
Mary Jo Knobloch, MPH, CPH , Division of Education, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI
Steven K. Broste, MS , Biostatistics and Data Management, Medtronic Neuromodulation, Champlin, MN
William Pickett, PhD , Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Agriculture has among the highest recorded exposures to dangerous levels of noise. Studies have demonstrated an increased prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among youth actively involved in farm work. Since most agricultural worksites are exempt from safety and health regulations, alternative strategies to promote hearing conservation among farm youth must be identified. We are evaluating the long-term effectiveness of a three-year hearing conservation program for farm youth conducted between 1992 and 1996 in Wisconsin, USA. Thirty-four rural schools had been recruited and randomized to intervention or control. The intervention included classroom instruction, distribution of hearing protection devices, direct mailings, noise level assessments, and yearly audiometric testing. The control group received the audiometric testing. In total, 690 high school farm youth completed the study. Students exposed to the hearing conservation program reported increased use of hearing protection devices (OR 7.73; 95% CI: 4.98 to 11.99), but there was no evidence of reduced levels of NIHL where odds ratios varied between 0.88 (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.34) at 3000 HZ to 1.55 (0.89 to 2.69) at 4000 HZ. Since NIHL is cumulative, a three-year study was likely not long enough to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention. A 16-year follow-up study of this hearing conservation program cohort is currently underway. To date, 356 former students have been recruited and enrolled. The results of this long-term follow-up will be available by November, 2010 and will demonstrate the role of early intervention in sustaining hearing protection behaviors and preventing NIHL in young workers.

Learning Areas:
Occupational health and safety

Learning Objectives:
Learning Objectives: Participants will: a) compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of the school-based hearing conservation program for farm youth, and b) assess the utility and effectiveness of an early and comprehensive hearing conservation program.

Keywords: Hearing Protection, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I am the Principal Investigator of the funded research study.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.