215312
Quality of end-of-life care in low-income, uninsured men dying of prostate cancer
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
: 11:15 AM - 11:30 AM
Jonathan Bergman, MD
,
Urology and Health Services, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Amanda Chi, BS
,
School of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Mark S. Litwin, MD, MPH
,
Urology and Health Services, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Background:We sought to assess the quality of end-of-life care in disadvantaged men prospectively enrolled in a public assistance program. We hypothesized that end-of-life care would be aggressive, moreso than recommended by quality-of-care guidelines. Methods:We included all 60 low-income, uninsured men in a state-funded public assistance program who had died since its inception in 2001. To measure quality of end-of-life care, we collected information about timing of the institution of new chemotherapeutic regimens; time from administration of last chemotherapy dose to death; the number of inpatient admissions and intensive care unit stays made in the 3 months preceding death, and the number of emergency room visits made in the 12 months before dying. We also noted hospice use and the timing of hospice referrals. Results:Eighteen men (30%) enrolled in hospice prior to death and the average hospice stay lasted 45 days (SD 32, range 2–143, median 41 days). Two patients (11%) were enrolled for fewer than 7 days, and none were enrolled for more than 180 days. The average time from administration of the last dose of chemotherapy to death was 104 days. Chemotherapy was never initiated within 3 months of death, and in only 2 instances (6%) was the final chemotherapeutic regimen administered within 2 weeks of dying. Use of hospital resources (emergency room visits, inpatient admissions, and intensive care unit stays) was uniformly low (mean 1.0±1.0, 0.65±0.82, 0.03±0.18, respectively). Conclusions:End-of-life care in disadvantaged men dying of prostate cancer, who enroll in a comprehensive statewide assistance program, is high-quality.
Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Clinical medicine applied in public health
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Learning Objectives: 1. Assess the efficacy of a public assistance program in delivering high-quality end of life care for men with prostate cancer.
Keywords: Access to Health Care, Community-Based Health Care
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I was primarily reponsible for designing, executing, and writing the study.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|