215361
Patient advocates and the promotion of social justice in cancer research at the National Cancer Institute
Camilla Benedicto, MPH, CPH
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Amy Bulman, BS
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Ben Carollo, MPA
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Meghan K. Gleason, MSW
,
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NIH Clinical Research Center, Bethesda, MD
James Hadley, MA
,
Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Virginia Hill, MSW
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Brooke Leggin, BA
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Sharon McCarthy, MSW, MPH
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Elizabeth Neilson, MSN, MPH
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Maya Thet, MSW
,
Office of Advocacy Relations, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Amanda Woodfield, MPH
,
Office of the Regional Director - Region V, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Chicago, IL
Since 2001, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has systematically engaged patient advocates in NCI activities to enhance the research process and promote social justice by engaging its ultimate consumer - those affected by cancer. In 2007, the NCI Director asked his advocate advisory committee (the Director's Consumer Liaison Group, or DCLG) to form a working group to study advocate involvement at the Institute and make recommendations for strengthening consumer participation. The resulting Advocates in Research Working Group (ARWG) developed recommendations in six areas: (1) recruiting diverse and highly qualified research advocates; (2) developing a robust assessment and matching process to link advocate skill sets to NCI needs; (3) providing training, coaching and resources to advocates and NCI staff; (4) guiding the advocate/staff engagement process; (5) tracking and evaluating advocate participation to measure outcomes and promote continuous quality improvement; and (6) retaining advocates and staff engaged in successful collaboration. The NCI Office of Advocacy Relations (OAR) is working with research advocates and representatives from across the Institute to implement the recommendations and increase the value of advocate engagement in the research process. Using the ARWG recommendations and lessons learned from the research literature, the National Cancer Institute aims to accelerate the progress of cancer research, advance social justice, and ultimately reduce health disparities.
Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Other professions or practice related to public health
Program planning
Learning Objectives: 1. Explain how advocate involvement enhances the research process.
2. Describe how engaging consumers in the research process promotes social justice.
3. Identify recommendations the Advocates in Research Working Group (ARWG) developed to strengthen consumer participation at the National Cancer Institute.
Keywords: Cancer, Advocacy
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the Director of Advocacy Relations at the National Cancer Institute and have overseen a two-year process with the Advocates in Research Working Group.
Any relevant financial relationships? Yes
Name of Organization |
Clinical/Research Area |
Type of relationship |
National Cancer Institute |
Advocacy |
Employment (includes retainer) |
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|