215762 Institutional capacity on psychological crisis intervention responding to public emergencies

Monday, November 8, 2010

Qian Ling , Chinese Center for Health Education, Beijing, China
Newman Ian , University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Zhang Wei , Chinese Center for Health Education, China CDC, Beijing, China
Objective: To evaluate the capacity of institutions providing professional psychological crisis intervention services in response to public emergencies. To provide a scientific basis for capacity building activities. Methods: Quantitative surveys were conducted among 163 psychological health institutions in 15 city/district in 6 provinces--Liaoning, Zhejiang, Anhui, Guangdong, Chongqing, Xinjiang, plus interviews with mental health professionals involved in emergencies. Results: 61.7% of psychological health professionals were 30-50 years old, and 45.8% had university degrees. 28.0% had ability for treating post-trauma problems. On average, each institution had an annual budget of 387,000 Chinese Yuan, of which 6.7% was for psychological crisis intervention in public emergencies. 41.5% of institutions had developed specific plans for dealing with emergency psychological crisis interventions. In the past two years on average, each psychological health institution had dealt with 118.5 psychological emergencies mostly responding with individual counseling and psycho-treatment. Resources for coping with psychological crisis in the southeast area were generally superior to those in the midwest areas. Conclusion: A lack of psychological professionals with appropriate skills training, and insufficient budgets severely restrict the ability to cope with psychological crisis interventions. It is suggested that policy and environmental support for psychological health institutions be strengthened the public emergency crisis intervention system. Proposed changes are suggested.

Learning Areas:
Diversity and culture
Provision of health care to the public
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of the session, the participant in this session will be able to •Describe the constitutional and capacity status of faculty who are responsible for psychological crisis intervention responding to public emergencies, in related mental health institutions. •Describe the financial and preparative plans status of psychological crisis intervention responding to public emergencies in related mental health institutions. •Recognize the differences of institutional capacity on psychological crisis intervention responding to public emergencies between western countries and China. •Discuss the possible strategies on institutional capacity building.

Keywords: Mental Health System, Emergency

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I was the principal of the program,taking charge of the design and the implementation and the evaluation. I have attended the APHA annual meeting since 2004 and have the experiences of oral or poster presentation.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.