215906 Potential Savings From Averted Smoking-Related Costs in Smoke-Free Multi-Unit Housing

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM

Michael K. Ong, MD PhD , Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Allison Diamant, MD, MSPH , Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Qiong Zhou, MS , Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Hye-Youn Park, PhD , Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento, CA
Robert Kaplan, PhD , Department of Health Services, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
BACKGROUND: Smoking-related costs in multi-unit housing (MUH) have not been systematically evaluated. This information could encourage MUH property owners and managers to support smoke-free MUH. METHODS: In 2008-2009 we conducted a computer-assisted telephone interview random sample survey of California apartment association membership, clustered by region. 343 (22.5% response rate) MUH property owners or managers were asked about past year smoking-related costs and smoke-free policies in their MUH property with the most recently vacated unit. We used a multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial model to predict the one-year savings from prevented smoking-related costs if all California MUH went smoke-free. RESULTS: 27.1% of the respondents incurred smoking-related costs with a mean of $4,935. Over half reported a smoke-free policy; 33.5% reported complete smoke-free policies and 20.3% reported partial smoke-free policies. 29.5% of not smoke-free properties incurred smoking-related costs, with a mean of $3,425; 39.7% of partially smoke-free properties incurred smoking-related costs, with a mean of $9,573; and 16.0% of completely smoke-free properties incurred smoking-related costs, with a mean of $1,866. We estimate that implementing complete smoke-free policies would save $18,094,254 in one year. CONCLUSION: Completely smoke-free MUH properties are nearly half as likely to incur smoking-related costs as MUH properties that are not smoke-free. Partially smoke-free MUH properties have the highest likelihood and amount of smoking-related costs; these policies may be a response to reduce such costs. The decision to make a property smoke free is likely to result in significant savings for the property owner.

Learning Areas:
Biostatistics, economics
Environmental health sciences
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
Assess the impact of implementing smoke-free multi-unit housing on smoking-related costs borne by owners and managers.

Keywords: Tobacco Policy, Economic Analysis

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I conduct research on tobacco control
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.