216179 Lifting drug policy barriers to evidence-based treatment

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 8:30 AM - 8:48 AM

Kasia Malinowska-Sempruch, MSW , Global Drug Policy Program C/O Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, Open Society Institute, Warszawa, Poland
Alexandra Kirby, MA , Global Drug Policy Program, Open Society Institute, Warszawa, Poland
Magdalena Dabkowska , Global Drug Policy program, Open Society Institute, Warsaw, Poland
Punishment, rather than treatment, is the focus of many national drug policies today. This approach not only fails to address drug-related problems, but also leads to public health crises and human rights abuses. Substitution treatment and needle exchange are effective in managing opiate dependence and reducing the risk of HIV transmission. Yet these evidence-based interventions are rarely implemented on a national scale, and remain controversial in many countries. In much of Eastern Europe and South-East Asia, where such interventions are illegal, estimates of HIV prevalence among injecting drug users often exceed 50%. Worldwide, only a handful of countries offer needle exchange in prisons. Through a series of informal policy discussions, involving top policy-makers and opinion-leaders, sustained media outreach, and academic study, our partners have managed to open up the debate in Latin America, leading to last year's policy changes in Mexico and Argentina. In Europe, studies of Portugal and the Czech Republic show that decriminalizing small amounts of illegal substances has greatly decreased the number of fatal overdoses and new HIV infections. Thanks to ongoing public debates, supported by video-advocacy, Germany, Switzerland, and Denmark all voted in 2009 to introduce heroin-assisted treatment. Recent policy reforms in Latin America and Europe show that governments are waking up to advocates' calls for drug policy to support public health interventions. To move forward, new voices need to join the debate, particularly in countries where prohibitionist policies remain dominant.

Learning Areas:
Public health or related public policy

Learning Objectives:
- Identify the negative consequences of prohibitionist drug policies for public health - Demonstrate examples of effective advocacy to achieve reforms in drug policy in order to support public health interventions. - Discuss the next steps forward in advocating for drug policy reforms to support public health interventions

Keywords: Advocacy, Policy/Policy Development

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I work for the Global Drug Policy program which supports advocacy projects related to public health and drug policy.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.