216780 Environmental Scan of State and Territorial Health Agency Participation in the Prevention of Child Maltreatment

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 : 10:30 AM - 10:50 AM

Sally Fogerty, BSN, MEd , Children's Safety Network, Education Development Center, Inc., Newton, MA
Sonia Suri, PhD , Independent Consultant, Newton, MA
Malia Richmond-Crum, MPH , Div. of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Natalie Wilkins, PhD, CPH , Division of Violence Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, GA
Patricia Hashima, PhD , Division of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
It is well documented that adverse events in childhood have a significant impact on brain development, and are linked to a wide range of poor health outcomes, including chronic diseases. To effectively address this multifaceted problem, a well integrated system of care serving children and families is required. Public health agencies in particular have much to contribute to the prevention of child maltreatment. They have extensive experience in developing programs and initiatives designed to improve the well-being and health of the broader population. In 2009, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, CDC Foundation, and Education Development Center/Children's Safety Network undertook an environmental scan of state/territorial public health agency efforts to better understand and identify approaches, programs and services that state/territorial public health agencies are engaging in to enhance family resiliency, foster the development of healthy children, and prevent child maltreatment. It is expected that information from the environmental scan, future case studies and other related activities will result in the development of new tools and resources to inform and enhance state efforts in the primary prevention of child maltreatment. The environmental scan was sent to all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The scan was given to both state public health Maternal and Child Health and Injury and Violence Prevention program directors for completion. Fifty states and the District of Columbia completed the scan for a 100% response rate. The territories will complete the scan in March 2010. The findings of the survey will be presented.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Public health administration or related administration
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1. Discuss specific approaches, programs and services that state and territorial public health agencies are currently implementing to foster safe, stable and nurturing relationships; these relationships help enhance family resiliency, foster the development of healthy children and prevent child maltreatment. 2. Describe best and promising practices in the prevention of child maltreatment. 3. Discuss challenges faced by state and territorial public health agencies working to prevent child maltreatment in their communities. 4. Discuss differences in resources and approaches used by state and territorial agencies to prevent child maltreatment in their communities. 5. Discuss the role and current efforts of state public health agencies.

Keywords: Children's Health, Violence Prevention

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present becuase I am the project director for the Public Health Leadership Initiative and helpe dto implemen thte environmental scan of state health departments' child maltreatment activities.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.