217087 Effectiveness replication of social norms marketing campaigns: Five universities across eight years

Wednesday, November 10, 2010 : 9:24 AM - 9:42 AM

Adrienne E. Keller, PhD , National Social Norms Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Background: Social norms marketing campaigns are among the most common interventions to decrease high risk drinking and associated negative consequences among college students. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of social norms marketing campaigns in real world conditions based on longitudinal changes in three measures (normative perceptions, personal drinking and alcohol-related negative consequences). Significance: This study provides health educators with important information on how effective social norms marketing is likely to be in the absence of a stringent research design. Methodology: Each university conducted annual media campaigns to correct misperceptions of student drinking. All data is from the American College Health Association's National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA) from 2002 through 2009, administered in the spring to random samples of students at each university. Sample sizes at each university vary from n=326 to n=1254 per year. Regression analyses examine changes in normative perceptions and personal drinking, controlling for demographic differences. Chi Square analyses examine change in each of seven negative consequences. Findings/Results: All schools had statistically significant (p<.001) sustained decreases in normative misperceptions. Four of the five had significant sustained decreases in personal drinking. Three schools had a significant decrease in at least one of seven negative consequences of drinking; one school had significant decreases in all seven. Conclusions/Recommendations: ACHA-NCHA data from eight years of social norms marketing campaigns at five diverse universities supports the conclusion that social norms marketing campaigns are effective in decreasing normative misperceptions, decreasing hazardous drinking and the associated negative consequences.

Learning Areas:
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
Describe the essential elements of a social norms marketing intervention Compare the difference between efficacy and effectiveness in program implementation and evaluation Analyze the evaluation components to a logic model for social norms marketing interventions Assess the measures of effectiveness in order to better estimate probable effectiveness in their settings

Keywords: Prevention, Evaluation

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: as Research Director of the National Social Norms Institute I am responsible for all data and I directly performed the data analysis myself.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.