217186 Respirator use Evaluation in Acute care California Hospitals (REACH): An assessment of respirator policies and practices for H1N1 influenza in the health care setting

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Stella Beckman, MPH , Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA
Lisa Brosseau, ScD , School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Maryann D'Alessandro, PhD , National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA
Suzi Goldmacher, RN, MSN, NP , Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA
John Halpin, MD, MPH , Emergency Preparedness and Response Office, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Atlanta, GA
Janice Kim, MD, MPH , Communicable Diseases Emergency Response Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA
Barbara Materna, PhD, CIH , Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA
Jennifer McNary, MPH, CIH , Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA
Debra Novak, PhD, RN, DSN , National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA
Charles Oke, VMD, MPH , National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA
Jennifer Zipprich, PhD, MS , Division of Environmental and Occupational Disease Control, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA
Robert Harrison, MD, MPH , Occupational Health Branch, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA
The California Department of Public Health, Occupational Health Branch, in collaboration with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), is performing an evaluation of respiratory protection programs in a sample of California hospitals during the H1N1 pandemic of 2009-2010. The objectives of this evaluation are to assess the implementation of respiratory protection programs in acute care hospitals in California in the context of H1N1, and to identify common barriers and successes in effective program implementation. Sixteen hospitals were randomly selected for participation, and approximately 21 interviews of hospital managers, unit managers, and healthcare workers were conducted in each hospital using a standardized survey instrument. Interviews included questions about the facility's respiratory protection program and implementation of this program, knowledge and beliefs regarding respirators, and safety climate of the facility. Clinical practices regarding respirator use were observed in each hospital. An anonymous online survey about respirator practices, knowledge, and beliefs was distributed via union email lists to healthcare workers throughout California. Descriptive statistics will be used to identify best practices and limitations of hospital respiratory protection programs. Results are expected to be available by the second quarter of 2010. Preliminary results suggest that there are common shortcomings in hospital respiratory protection program implementation and adherence. The results of this evaluation will be used to identify barriers to implementing and sustaining successful respiratory protection programs for pandemic influenza. This knowledge will aid CDPH and NIOSH in providing useful and timely guidance to healthcare facilities regarding respiratory protection for healthcare workers.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Occupational health and safety

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe Respirator use Evaluation in Acute care California Hospitals (REACH) project 2. Evaluate use of respiratory protection by California healthcare workers during the H1N1 influenza pandemic 3. Identify problems and successes in developing and implementing respiratory protection programs in California acute care hospitals.

Keywords: Health Care Workers, Occupational Health

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I had key roles in developing and executing the evaluation project, and in analysis of the results.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.