Menu labeling policy analysis: A comparison of six menu labeling bills for the state of Utah

In this age of convenience, tight schedules, and multiple demands, maintaining healthy weight and eating properly are challenges Americans face. In addition, eating out is more prevalent than ever. Policy-makers have implemented menu labeling at restaurants which includes posting or providing calorie information and basic nutritional facts as one strategy to assist in making healthier choices. Although some states have implemented their own forms of menu labeling, this policy analysis asks the question, “What form of menu labeling, if any, could be effective in influencing healthier consumer choices in the state of Utah?” Major menu labeling models were researched including the MEAL, LEAN, Seattle, California, and New York City Act, as well as the Compromise Bill. Standards of judgment were created based on an extensive literature review and each model was systematically compared and ranked. The models were ranked by significance in affecting consumer choices. Results showed that none of the menu labeling models had an effect upon healthy consumer choices due to a lack of evidence-based research. The study concluded that Utah should not implement any of the menu labeling models analyzed. The next step is to advocate for more research evaluating effects on consumer choices from menu-labeling models and other methods like taxation of sugary drinks. If further research shows that menu labeling is effective, state legislators and health advocates should implement the Compromise Bill.