217856 Best practices and lessons learned from community mitigation efforts during the H1N1 pandemic

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 : 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM

Andrew S. LaJoie, PhD, MSPH , Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Public Health and Information Sciences, Louisville, KY
Ginny Sprang, PhD , Center for the Study of Violence Against Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Phyllis Leigh, MSW, CSW , Center for the Study of Violence Against Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Candice Jackson, MSW, CSW , Center for the Study of Violence Against Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Miriam S. Silman, MSW , Center for the Study of Violence Against Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Charmaine Mohipp , Center for the Study of Violence Against Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
James J. Clark, PhD , Center for the Study of Violence Against Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Background: During a pandemic, community mitigation efforts may include quarantine and isolation. Children and their families are susceptible to adverse mental health outcomes if not prepared to be separated from family and social networks. Adequate planning and protection of vulnerable populations in pandemic situations has become a contemporary social justice issue warranting increased attention at the national, state and local levels. Methods: A systematic review of all State Pandemic Preparedness and Response plans was done to assess the utility of the guidelines to address the needs of children and families. Qualitative data from focus groups and interviews from public health professionals in Kentucky, Texas, Florida, Arizona, California and New York was collected to assess public health responses to the Fall 2009 outbreak of H1N1. Results: The pandemic plans of the states varied in detail; ultimately though, little specific attention was given apriori to the needs of families and children facing quarantine or isolation. As the pandemic unfolded, however, examples of best practice strategies emerged in cities with epidemic rates of illness that can be instructive in future pandemic events. Conclusions: State planners often overlook the unique challenges facing families and children during quarantine and isolation. The mental health consequences of being underprepared for separation can be dire and lasting. During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, strategies were developed to address some of these challenges. This presentation highlights these lessons learned and makes recommendations for best practice guidelines for families and children facing quarantine and isolation during pandemic situations.

Learning Areas:
Protection of the public in relation to communicable diseases including prevention or control
Public health or related laws, regulations, standards, or guidelines
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1. Compare the impact of community mitigation efforts on families and children across different states in the U.S. 2. Describe the mental health impacts of isolation from mitigation efforts.

Keywords: Mental Health, Disease Prevention

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I conducted funded research in the area of disaster mental health, risk communication, and health promotion.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.