218376
Conversations with tobacco control professionals about funding cuts and the future of services
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
: 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM
Lean Camara, MSW
,
SEPA Tobacco Control Project, Health Promotion Council, Philadelphia, PA
Kristin O. Minot, MS
,
Research & Evaluation Group, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Maya Gutierrez
,
Research & Evaluation Group, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Kathleen Coughey, PhD
,
Research and Evaluation, Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA
Background: The Southeastern Pennsylvania (SEPA) Tobacco Control Program provides tobacco prevention and cessation services in seven counties. In the fall of 2009, the program underwent a 45% budget cut when the state government re-directed Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) funds. Interviews about the anticipated unmet community needs were conducted with 24 tobacco control professionals to understand their concerns about the repercussions of the cuts on programming. Continued program monitoring and ongoing conversation with local service providers will capture actual and anticipated service changes due to these funding cuts. Findings: Repercussions from the funding cuts were anticipated in each of the CDC goal areas. Interviewees cited recent promotion drawing attention to now-cancelled school-based prevention programming, cuts to programs targeting disparately affected populations, changes in capacity to promote tobacco smoke pollution campaigns and fears that news of the cuts would discourage smokers from participating in cessation programs. Conversations focused on a loss of momentum in tobacco control and issues of trust for schools, businesses and individuals who had been promised services. Conclusions: Interviews with tobacco control professionals provided a range of perspectives on the unmet needs of community members and the impact of state budget cuts on local programming. Anticipated needs for service were noted in every area of tobacco prevention and control. One year after the reductions in service, program data and ongoing discussions with interviewees will provide a more complete picture of the impact of the cut in MSA funding on service recipients.
Learning Areas:
Administration, management, leadership
Advocacy for health and health education
Program planning
Public health or related public policy
Public health or related research
Social and behavioral sciences
Learning Objectives: 1.Explain the relationships between funding and needs in each of the CDC goal areas.
2.Assess the impact of reductions of service in one area on anticipated need in another.
3.Compare anticipated unmet needs with actual changes in service after a year of reduced funding.
Keywords: Funding, Tobacco Control
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because of my familiarity with this research and my experience working as an evaluator of county, state and regional tobacco control programs.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|