218396 Local Wellness Policy Implementation and Demographic and Policy Characteristics in West Virginia School Districts

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 : 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM

Laura Esch, BA, CHES , Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Stephanie S. Frost, MA , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Lucas C. Moore, EdD , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Nancy O'Hara Tompkins, PhD , Prevention Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Jessica Coffman, MA , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Rick Deem , Office of Healthy Schools, WV Department of Education, Charleston, WV
Mollie Wood, MSW, MPA , Office of Child Nutrition, WV Department of Education, Charleston, WV
Don Chapman, MS , Office of Healthy School, West Virginia Department of Education, Charleston, WV
Melanie Purkey, MS , Office of Healthy School, West Virginia Department of Education, Charleston, WV
Andrew S. Bradlyn, PhD , ICF Macro, Morgantown, WV
Carole V. Harris, PhD , Health Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Background: Previous research on Local Wellness Policies (LWP) indicates varying degrees of policy implementation and quality across districts, and some studies have observed relationships between district demographics and LWP quality/strength. Purpose: This study investigates LWP implementation, quality and differences in district characteristics in WV schools. Significance: Assessing LWP implementation is important in determining policy impact. Methodology: LWPs and demographic information for all 55 WV school districts were obtained. As part of a larger evaluation of the state's childhood obesity legislation, policies were rated on 12 categories addressing LWP required components and best practices as well as language strength. Degree of LWP implementation was based on superintendent reports. Standardized t tests and ANOVA analyses assessed district and policy differences for degree of implementation and quality both independently and in combination. Results: Superintendent surveys (95% response rate) for the 2007-08 school year revealed LWP policy implementation remained at low levels for many districts: 8 were only 25% implemented, 18 were 50% implemented, 20 were 75% implemented and 7 were 100% implemented. No significant differences were found between district demographic characteristics and policy implementation independently or in combination with policy quality or strength. Conclusions: The low degree of LWP policy implementation 2 years after development is of concern. We found no evidence to suggest demographic or policy characteristics were significantly associated with degree of LWP implementation in WV school districts. Possible reasons for lack of associations are discussed including reports of implementation, district characteristics, and the LWP rating system.

Learning Areas:
Advocacy for health and health education
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Public health or related organizational policy, standards, or other guidelines

Learning Objectives:
Describe possible reasons for the lack of associations between degree of Local Wellness Policy implementation and differences in district characteristics in West Virginia schools.

Keywords: School Health, Policy/Policy Development

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present this abstract because I am a PhD student in public health who was involved in examining data related to local wellness policy implementation in West Virginia schools.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.