219269 Social marketing to decrease smoking among young adult trendsetters in San Diego

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Pamela Ling, MD, MPH , Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Jeff Jordan, MA , Rescue Social Change Group, San Diego, CA
Torsten B. Neilands, PhD , Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Stanton A. Glantz, PhD , Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Significance: Young adults (age 18-25) have disproportionately high smoking rates. “Psychographics” (attitudes, social groups, activities) used in commercial marketing can also be used to define targets for tobacco control interventions.

Objective: Evaluate the effects of a psychographically targeted social marketing intervention on smoking behavior among young adult trendsetters in San Diego.

Methods: We used venue date time sampling to recruit repeated cross-sectional samples of 1000 young adults attending bars in San Diego CA at baseline and 2 years follow up. We measured socio-cultural group affiliations, social concern, smoking attitudes, and cigarette use. Trendsetters were members of a single socio-cultural group with social concern scores in the highest quartile.

Results: Young adults reporting exposure to the campaign more frequently associated it with Trendsetters (47.3% versus 26.7% of those not exposed), liked it a lot (37% versus 1%), and recognized its stance against big corporations (60% versus 46.1%). We did not observe differences between the exposed and unexposed respondents in tobacco attitudes (tobacco industry denormalization or valuing a smokefree lifestyle) or smoking norms. The smoking prevalence in the entire sample was 55.9% at baseline and 53.7% at follow up. There was a trend towards decreased smoking among the Trendsetters, where the current smoking prevalence was 77.4% at baseline and 69.7% at follow up, and regular smoking was 47.7% at baseline and 44.3% at follow up.

Discussion: Psychographically targeted interventions in bars/clubs effectively reach high risk trendsetters. The intervention was accepted and liked; we will continue to monitor smoking attitude and behavior trends.

Learning Areas:
Conduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Program planning
Public health or related education
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe how psychographic segmentation strategies are used to define targets for commercial marketing campaigns 2. Explain how a social marketing intervention targeted to a high risk psychographic segment of the young adult population attending bars in San Diego was designed and executed 3. Evaluate the effects of the campaign on the smoking behavior of the target audience

Keywords: Tobacco Control, Interventions

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am the principal investigator of this study. I am a published expert on young adult smoking behavior and tobacco marketing, and present work at APHA annually.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.