219562
Increasing Rates of Partner Treatment as a Population-level Tool for STD Control
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
: 12:30 PM - 12:50 PM
Richard Goldsworthy, PhD, MSEd
,
Academic Edge, Inc., Bloomington, IN
J. Dennis Fortenberry, MD, MS
,
Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
BACKGROUND: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) for sex partners of people infected with gonorrhea and chlamydial infection is recommended as a clinical option in states other than where state laws appear to prohibit the practice. More recently, the Centers for Disease Control has attended to EPT as a broad programmatic option to facilitate partner treatment and thereby population-level sexually transmitted disease (STD) control. Using a framework of population-level prevention impact, this talk describes the rationale for expanding the use of EPT nationally, contingencies for programmatic use, and current efforts to expand EPT use. METHODS: Putative legal prohibitions were most frequently cited as barriers to EPT uptake. An assessment of the legal landscape pertinent to EPT in 2005 – 2006 established a baseline for measuring coverage interventions. CDC's 2008 recommendations for integrated partner services (HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydial infection) presented a framework for programs, and CDC collaborated with states and professional organizations interested in facilitating EPT. RESULTS: By 2009, there was a doubling in the number of states expressly permitting EPT and a 30% decline in the number with specific prohibitions. States that created protocols and legal permissions and professional organizations that explicitly endorsed EPT as an option contributed to the expansion of EPT. DISCUSSION: In terms of prevention impact, an efficacious and widely applicable intervention addressing a population that contributes to morbidity has achieved greater coverage in that population. This background sets the stage for the greater incorporation of patients and partners into the population-level goal through expedited partner services.
Learning Areas:
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Provision of health care to the public
Public health or related public policy
Learning Objectives: (1) Describe the role of EPT in partner treatment and STD control
(2) Discuss how nationwide collaborative efforts to address barriers can increase intervention coverage
(3) Describe the need to address both program-level and patient/partner-level factors to facilitate STD control via partner treatment
Presenting author's disclosure statement:Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I serve as Chief of the Behavioral Interventions and Research Branch (BIRB) in the Division of STD Prevention, NCHSSTP, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and oversee EPT efforts therein.
Any relevant financial relationships? No
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines,
and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed
in my presentation.
|