In this Section |
219573 Assessment of the Regional Cancer Coalitions of Georgia's Interventions and InitiativesMonday, November 8, 2010
Background: This evaluation study addresses the impact of the coalitions on their respective regions as they seek to close gaps in cancer mortality/ morbidity. Sustainability efforts and targeted initiatives in early detection/ screening, diagnosis/staging, treatment/palliation, and data/metrics are analyzed and discussed. Methods: Investigators tracked coalition activities in six regions of the state using a system designed to monitor efforts and assess intermediate outcomes. Coalitions completed tracking logs in five programmatic areas and also reported core functions including documentation of strategic planning, and funding support. The study sought to answer the following questions: 1. What is the return on investment of state funding at the regional level? 2. What are intermediate outcomes of RCCG activities? Results: The RCCG obtained $1,602,937 from all state sources to produce $2,847,159.97 in local funds, resulting in 36% state funding to 64% local funding ratio.
The RCCG developed and implemented 62 initiatives. Cancer screening initiatives resulted in cancer screenings for 2,761 underserved persons. This number represents a 56% increase in screening from the previous year. As a result of those screening initiatives 19 cancers were discovered. Conclusion: There continues to be support for coalitions at the local level and there is community-wide change as evidenced, for one example, by the increase in cancer screenings. The RCCG have partnered with various entities to create sustainable coalitions to address cancer care in Georgia. These findings support previous reports that community coalitions can play a vital role in the prevention and cancer control.
Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programsConduct evaluation related to programs, research, and other areas of practice Systems thinking models (conceptual and theoretical models), applications related to public health Learning Objectives: Keywords: Cancer, Coalition
Presenting author's disclosure statement:
Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I am the Principal Investigator for the project. I also serve as the Associate Director for Research for the Center for Rural Health and Health Disparities and the Director for the Master of Public Health Program for Mercer University School of Medicine.
I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.
Back to: 3081.2: Public Health Perspectives on Cancer Treatment and Survivorship
|