222858 Effects of an individual-based weight loss intervention concurrent to an environmental intervention in a worksite setting

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Kristin Baker Parker, MPH , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Heather M. Padilla, MS, RD, LD , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
David M. DeJoy, PhD , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Dafina Shearry , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Mark G. Wilson, HSD , Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Ron Z. Goetzel, PhD , Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Washington, DC
Per Healthy People 2010, an important setting for reducing obesity is the workplace, which has many nested levels (e.g., individual/worker, workgroup, organization, and external environment). LightenUP (LUP) is an intervention targeting workgroup and organization levels through moderate and intense environmental interventions at the worksite that found small but positive results for body mass index (BMI) and weight, but mixed results for other behavioral and biometric outcomes over 2 years. Since many LUP participants also participated in an individual-based weight loss intervention (YW8), this analysis examines whether the LUP results are attributable to the environmental intervention alone or in combination with YW8. Interestingly, those at the intense LUP intervention sites were less likely to participate in YW8 (58.8%, odds ratio (OR)=.600, p=.001) than their counterparts at the moderate LUP intervention sites (63.7%). At baseline, YW8 participants at intense sites were more educated, held more professional jobs, and had higher BMI than non-participants; however, no differences were found between YW8 participants and non-participants at moderate sites. At the intense sites, the prevalence of YW8 participants at risk for physical activity (β=-.644, p=.002) and stress (β=-1.226, p<.003) decreased over the 2 year period compared to non-participants. Unfortunately, the behavioral changes did not translate into the anticipated changes in weight-related outcomes. Though it does not appear that the concurrent individual-based intervention increased the effectiveness of the environmental intervention, further discussion of YW8 participants' engagement in the intervention and goal-setting behaviors will be explored as possible explanations for these results.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Occupational health and safety
Program planning
Social and behavioral sciences

Learning Objectives:
1. Describe the various components of the environmental and individual interventions. 2. Identify the effects of the intervention levels on outcomes. 3. Discuss the possible explanations for these results.

Keywords: Environmental Health, Worksite

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: The focus of my masters and doctoral studies has been on workplace health promotion, and throughout this time I have been intimately involved in the NHLBI sponsored study of environmental intervention aimed at weight management. The current study is a natural progression of that work by examining the effect of the individual level intervention in conjunction with the environmental intervention. Finally, I have successfully presented at previous APHA conferences on other aspects of this project.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.