223067 Increasing colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care practices: Results from the Appalachia Community Cancer Network

Monday, November 8, 2010 : 8:48 AM - 9:06 AM

William Curry, MD, MS , Department of Family Medicine, Penn State University Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
Brenda Kluhsman, PhD, MSS , Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
Eugene J. Lengerich, VMD, MS , Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
Jason Liao, PhD , Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
Background: Colorectal (CRC) cancer is the third most commonly occurring cancer in the U.S. and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Early detection through periodic screening is recommended for average-risk adults 50-74 years of age because it has been shown to reduce CRC mortality. However, uptake of CRC screening by patients in rural and medically underserved Appalachia is not universal, even among patients in a primary care clinic. The objective of our study was to determine the feasibility of using academic detailing to increase CRC screening in rural primary care practices.

Methods: We developed and implemented clinic-based academic detailing with feedback in four primary care practices, three of which used electronic medical records, in rural Pennsylvania. Academic detailing included education, small media, and practice aids. We measured the uptake of CRC screening before and after detailing by reviewing randomly selected medical charts. We used Key-informant interviews and focus groups for qualitative evaluation.

Results: We reviewed 323 records during the pre-intervention and 301 post-intervention phases. The prevalence of being current with screening recommendation was 56% in the pre-intervention, with 60% being current in the post-intervention (p=0.029), while the prevalence of having been screened in the past year increased from 17% to 35% (p<0.001). Qualitative evaluation reported that the intervention was well received.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates the feasibility of academic detailing with chart review to increase CRC screening in Appalachia, an area that experiences cancer health disparities. Future research should examine the long-term impact of the academic detailing intervention.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Planning of health education strategies, interventions, and programs
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Discuss factors that affect uptake of CRC screening in Appalachia; Assess the feasibility of using academic detailing with chart review to increase CRC screening

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I planned and implemented the project being presented.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.