223865 Efficacy of the Promoting Access to Health Services (PATHS) intervention

Tuesday, November 9, 2010 : 9:24 AM - 9:42 AM

Jana J. Peterson, MPH, PhD , UMKC Institute for Human Development (UCEDD), University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
Rie Suzuki, PhD , Department of Health Sciences and Administration, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI
Emily S. Walsh, MPH, CPH , Child Development & Rehabilitation Center, RRTC: Health & Wellness, Portland, OR
David I. Buckley, MD, MPH , Departments of Family Medicine, Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, and Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Gloria L. Krahn, PhD, MPH , National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
Recommended screening can improve cancer detection and diagnosis, resulting in lower cancer mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a theory-based program to promote regular mammography and Papanicolou (Pap) testing among women with mobility impairments who are overdue for screenings. Promoting Access to Health Services (PATHS) is an intervention designed to increase receipt of mammography and Pap tests among women with mobility impairments. PATHS is based on the Health Belief Model and Social Cognitive theory. It consists of a 90-minute participatory small-group workshop, followed by six months of structured telephone support. We evaluated the efficacy of PATHS through a randomized controlled trial. Women aged 35 – 64 with mobility impairments were recruited through a Medicaid managed care organization and a durable medical equipment vendor in Oregon during 2008 and 2009. Women who reported not receiving a Pap test in the past three years and/or a mammogram (if age >40 years) in the last two years were eligible. Of 211 women randomized, 156 completed the study (26% attrition). We used chi-square testing to compare the intervention and control groups for self-reported receipt of screenings at six-month follow-up. The intervention group was more likely to have received a Pap test (n=71, X2=8.2, p<.01). No significant group effect was observed for mammography (n=125, X2 = 0.6, p=.45). Intervention influences on theoretical mediators (e.g. self-efficacy) will also be presented. We will discuss potential explanations for differences in mammography and Pap test effects, and implications for health promotion programs.

Learning Areas:
Administer health education strategies, interventions and programs
Chronic disease management and prevention
Implementation of health education strategies, interventions and programs
Public health or related research

Learning Objectives:
Describe efficacy of health promotion program to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among women with mobility impairments. Explain possible differences for efficacy associated with different screening tests. Discuss the implication of these findings for strategies to improve health care access.

Keywords: Clinical Prevention Services, Disability

Presenting author's disclosure statement:

Qualified on the content I am responsible for because: I am qualified to present because I am the principal investigator of the research included in this proposal and have expertise in public health promotion practice.
Any relevant financial relationships? No

I agree to comply with the American Public Health Association Conflict of Interest and Commercial Support Guidelines, and to disclose to the participants any off-label or experimental uses of a commercial product or service discussed in my presentation.